The back-peddling master is actually spot on. GGG would not be able to touch Floyd...based on what we saw against Jacobs. But to say you would "work over" GGG is a bit of a stretch.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Mayweather: 'Triple L' Golovkin Came Up Short, I'd Work Him Over!
Collapse
-
at least Floyd did not use the excuse.....
" Canelo is too big, but I can still beat GGG, honest..... "
like Golovkin did.....
" Jacobs is too big, but I can still beat Ward, honest..... "
#Jacobstoobigtoostrongdoe
#anyonefrom154-168doe
#caneasilybeatKovalevWardandStevensondoe
Comment
-
Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View PostRetired former five division world champion Floyd Mayweather Jr. (49-0, 26 KOs) was not impressed by last Saturday's performance from IBF, IBO, WBC, WBA middleweight champion Gennady Golovkin (37-0, 33 KOs). Golovkin was taken the twelve round distance for the first time in his career, when he won a close unanimous decision over mandatory challenger Daniel Jacobs (32-2, 29 KOs) at New York's Madison Square Garden.
[Click Here To Read More]
It's funny how we never heard this whilst he was still active.
Comment
-
Originally posted by robertzimmerman View PostEasy to say with the slippers on sat at home on the sofa.
It's funny how we never heard this whilst he was still active.
ummm..... it is easy to say that when you are a LEGEND who has accomplished far more than Golovkin could ever dream of accomplishing
and, we heard nothing but "this" when Mayweather was active..... caveat being, he actually followed through and made those big fights
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postummm..... it is easy to say that when you are a LEGEND who has accomplished far more than Golovkin could ever dream of accomplishing
and, we heard nothing but "this" when Mayweather was active..... caveat being, he actually followed through and made those big fights
Nobody is arguing about Floyd being a legend. But anybody can use the word: IF.
Why didn't we hear Floyd say this before? He's using the fact that he's retired as some sort of protective wall. It's pathetic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by robertzimmerman View PostYou're obsessed.
Nobody is arguing about Floyd being a legend. But anybody can use the word: IF.
Why didn't we hear Floyd say this before? He's using the fact that he's retired as some sort of protective wall. It's pathetic.
fair call
but..... Hagler, Leonard, Hearns, and Duran..... ALL said they would have beaten Mayweather
and ALL of them are entitled to make that claim
benefits of being a legend I suppose
Froch made similar comments regarding Golovkin, and again..... he has earned that right
doesn't mean that any of them were right, including Mayweather
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postfair call
but..... Hagler, Leonard, Hearns, and Duran..... ALL said they would have beaten Mayweather
and ALL of them are entitled to make that claim
benefits of being a legend I suppose
Froch made similar comments regarding Golovkin, and again..... he has earned that right
doesn't mean that any of them were right, including Mayweather
Floyd retired not even 2 years ago, plus we all know he's coming back for at least McGregor, and one more if that isn't officially recognised as number 50.
I've no real problem with Floyd thinking he'd have beaten him. But the difference is: He was quiet when he was active, and now he's talking about him in a derogatory way giving him a nickname and saying he'd be easy etc. It's a joke. If he was still active now, you know he wouldn't have said a word.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostDebatable???
People that think manny won are like people that believe that the earth is flat. They are not to be taken seriously.
But JC beat BH. Is JC greater than BH? Some seem to thi nk just cos Floyd beat poac means he's greater?
Comment
Comment