Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Jacobs' Manager: GGG's Side Will Make Excuses to Avoid Rematch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    I dunno...it was a tacticle fight, but when the two were exchanging, Jacobs was winning most of those. If I use Max Kellerman's rule of "who would you rather have been", I'd rather have been Jacobs in those exchanges . I don't know about the Chocolatito fight either...he was beating the hell out of the Filipino dude.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
      I saw the fight for the first time yesterday. Extremely tough fight to score. I personally had it either a draw or GGG by 1pt because of the KD. Jacobs did much better than anyone expected. Myself included. GGG seemed hesitant to commit to his usual seek and destroy approach but still landed some nice shots throughout the fight as did Jacobs.

      There were no losers in my eyes. A rematch is warranted.

      Those saying that Jacobs was robbed are saying so due to Jacobs doing better than expected given the fact that he was the underdog going in and was facing a perceived "killer" who wasn't able to dispose of Jacobs as he's done with previous opponents. Because he did better than expected doesn't mean he won.
      I don't perceive GGG as a "killer." I don't even think he's that good a fighter. I just think Jacobs outboxed him, and made him look silly at times. I scored it 114-113 Jacobs. But wasn't outraged by the decision. I think it warrants a rematch.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
        I saw the fight for the first time yesterday. Extremely tough fight to score. I personally had it either a draw or GGG by 1pt because of the KD. Jacobs did much better than anyone expected. Myself included. GGG seemed hesitant to commit to his usual seek and destroy approach but still landed some nice shots throughout the fight as did Jacobs. And actualley they gave jocobs 5 rds. But still.

        There were no losers in my eyes. A rematch is warranted.

        Those saying that Jacobs was robbed are saying so due to Jacobs doing better than expected given the fact that he was the underdog going in and was facing a perceived "killer" who wasn't able to dispose of Jacobs as he's done with previous opponents. Because he did better than expected doesn't mean he won.
        So you had it being a tie or g by 1 pt in a questionable kd,yet you say us screaming robbery are just biased based on expectations, yet you do know the judges had it not even close going into championship rds? Or that they did the most obvious cheating judge's do by having g way ahead early so they can give jacobs some late rds 1 or 2 he didnt win even & still have g retain his title.All I ask is objectivity, according to gs fans canelo lost to lara,trout,cotto & ward robbed kov yet supposededly g won CLEARLY.(im not saying u said that)Remember g supposedly won 7 rds which is the definition of robbery.Anyone who says g won close to 7 rds is either 51/50 or blind or both.
        And actually they gave jocobs 5 rds but still they gave him the wrong rds.
        And I told everyone on several sites that jacobs would expose him,sure enough he looked like he just wanted the fight to be over.
        Last edited by kushking; 03-26-2017, 01:26 PM.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by mrlopez View Post
          GGG vs Saunders in June, CONelo in Sept. Let Jacobs fight Lemieux on the Sept undercard, tben the winners fight in December
          That would be ideal.

          Comment


          • #75
            You can't say that GGG is going to find a way out of this fight AND then acknowledge there is a chance that the fight happens this year after BJS and CONelo get their turns.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by Butch.McRae View Post
              Nobody wants to see Jacobs/Lemieux. Lemieux gets beat easily in the fight and it wouldn't make any money. It's a waste of Danny's time. If he can't get back on GGG's radar, then he's better served taking a fight with Lee (in NYC) and then Charlo after he gets comfy at 160.

              David Lemieux is just a decent professional fighter and his record shows that. Beating a 5'7 Stevens means nothing.

              So wait, David Lemiex would be a waste of time but Andy Lee wouldn't be? Curtis Stevens was at least a solid middleweight contender. From what I heard, Andy Lee came back from a long layoff and looked terrible in his last fight against a guy who had much less credibility than Stevens. I agree that Jacobs would beat Lemieux's ass but Lemieux is a much better choice of opponent. Lee needs another fight against better opposition to show he isn't washed up.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
                Jacobs got robbed!
                Jacobs got robbed...of an opportunity to win by fighting harder and be the bigger man by accepting the loss.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by Drew Bundini Br View Post
                  GGG's team is about as dumb as a bread box!!! He had the audacity to say that Saunders is his dream fight! GTFOH!!!

                  He made 2.4mil last week and was offered 15mil straight up and refuse Canelo.

                  His PPV numbers are in the toilet!!

                  GGG needs to forget about everybody and agree to fight Canelo after he beats the lazy Chavez. He should sign a contract asap to secure Canelo in sept. take the 15mil straight as the B side and then if he beats Canelo then he becomes the A side with all negotiating power!! He's going on 35 yrs old and is making less than he should be!
                  Did Lara ebcome the A-side to anyone after he beat Canelo? No.

                  Also, the only source that said GGG was offered 15 million was the same person who said Canelo wasn't a real middleweight before pushing through a deal for Canelo to fight above middleweight.
                  Last edited by yankees7448; 03-26-2017, 01:48 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Way too much made of this decision

                    Clearly all the delusional PBC fans TMT fans and pro afro American fans are just regurgitating the propaganda they hear from outlets like Dontae Boxing that plays on their agendas based on race and anti white foreigners.

                    Ggg clearly won 4-6 rounds early and rounds 8,9 & 12 with ease giving swing rounds to jacobs in round 2 & 11. 116-111 or 115-112 are the only logical scores based on real boxing judging. Jacobs fought scared and confused needing to fught southpaw half the fught just to survive!

                    The 6am weigh in was a clear adv to jacobs who easily was a cruiserweight that night. Screwed GGG on the same day weigh in. Id love to see a fight canceled next time these fighters do this crap. Floyd did it to Marquez in 2010 coming in 146 when contract was 144 and paid him off. Castillo did it to Corrales in the rematch and salido did it to loma! Enough is enough. Weight advantage is too much a handicap for anyone.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by hitking View Post
                      Right. So gotta love those great "unifications" where a supposed top 5 P4P fighter is fighting a guy that's not even top 100. #allthebelts


                      Someone is the hateraide.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP