Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Jacobs' Manager: GGG's Side Will Make Excuses to Avoid Rematch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
    So wait, David Lemiex would be a waste of time but Andy Lee wouldn't be? Curtis Stevens was at least a solid middleweight contender. From what I heard, Andy Lee came back from a long layoff and looked terrible in his last fight against a guy who had much less credibility than Stevens. I agree that Jacobs would beat Lemieux's ass but Lemieux is a much better choice of opponent. Lee needs another fight against better opposition to show he isn't washed up.
    That's a fair opinion. I just view Lee as a superior boxer.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
      And yet Jacobs is supposed to be the aggressor despite throwing and landing fewer punches.

      ****ing haterz.
      Only gspotters BELIEVE jabs are equal to power shots,& that the guy jabbing & getting hit w power shots all fight won.And jacobs threw waaay more power shots also almost 30% more but he was scared

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Butch.McRae View Post
        That's a fair opinion. I just view Lee as a superior boxer.
        Lemeiux is the same bum who lost twice in a row to absolute bums,alcine the worst fighter ever with 12 losses almost on the trot. And wasted rubio tkod him. He had these losses before he fought gstring,yet g supposededly "won" his only actual title vs him AFTER lemeiux was gifted a vacant trinket & didnt even defend it.(making him by definition a paper non- champ) Only g fans think Lemeiux was ever good.
        Last edited by kushking; 03-26-2017, 02:16 PM.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by -PBP- View Post
          I don't want to see this again. It's a waste of a fight.
          You don't know **** about boxing

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by kushking View Post
            Only gspotters BELIEVE jabs are equal to power shots,& that the guy jabbing & getting hit w power shots all fight won.And jacobs threw waaay more power shots also almost 30% more but he was scared
            Not saying they are equal. But GGG landed 105 jabs to Jacobs 31 while Jacobs outlanded GGG in power punches 144-to 126. Jacobs landed 19 more power punches over a 12 round fight. That's almost 2 more punches a round. Big ****ing deal. And we're also supposed to 19 more power punches over a 12 round fight more than landing 3 times as many jabs as Jacobs. And GGG landed almost 50% of his power shots versus Jacobs 38.8%. Jacobs may have landed slightly more but GGG was far more accurate and considering it was Jacobs that got dropped it was GGG's power punches that were more effective. Gotta love GGG haters. They go out of their way to find the one or two stats that barely support their argument and then they beat that dead horse until its nothing more than a puddle of blood soaked hair.
            Last edited by yankees7448; 03-26-2017, 03:14 PM.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by kushking View Post
              Typical golovtards cant stand facts, but attack me with ad hominems to me & my family. Funny you cant come up with any actual arguments based on provable facts to negate mine.:bukkake:
              Lol.. ****nym*

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Butch.McRae View Post
                That's a fair opinion. I just view Lee as a superior boxer.
                I would agree but I also think he'd have to be because he's very fluid. Jacobs would outmanuever him with ease.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
                  Not saying they are equal. But GGG landed 105 jabs to Jacobs 31 while Jacobs outlanded GGG in power punches 144-to 126. And GGG landed almost 50% of his power shots. Gotta love GGG haters. They go out of their way to find the one or two stats that barely support their argument and then they beat that dead horse until its nothing more than a puddle of blood soaked hair.
                  Just ignore kushking, kid is a ****ing ****** who knows nothing about boxing

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Piper the Great View Post
                    You don't know **** about boxing

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
                      Someone is the hateraide.
                      Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
                      They have the 28-6 Ganigan Lopez at #43 which is a few spots better than guys like Deontay Wilder, Carlos Cuadras, Scott Quigg, Anthony Joshua. Some dude named Errol Spence, you might have heard of him, is only ranked at#57. Yea, I wouldn't trust their rankings.
                      I think I stated in my post that boxrec "isn't the best source." That said, in a P4P sense, Saunders isn't very good. He's a huge underdog against GGG, Canelo, Jacobs, and Charlo. So of all of GGG's options, Saunders is the worst. Yet his fans claim he's the priority. That's ridiculous. And its not hating to point it out.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP