scrawny Golovkin's Horrid Performance Against Southpaw Gardner...tsk tsk

[Lester Tutor]

He sometimes switches to southpaw, but he's basically orthodox.

Accepting Jacobs as a southpaw doe, and if GGG's team have been avoiding southpaws, like you say, then why did they give Danny more than his mandated split in order to get him to accept the fight?

If they wanted to avoid him they could have just said "The mandated split is 75/25, take it or leave it" and the fight wouldn't be happening.

They are trying to beat Bhops record, that's ggg's call, and his manager and promoter have to play it. Nothing wrong with avoiding difficult fights to achieve that goal, but it will be scrutinized just like the vast opinions for other fighters. Follow the role of poster, OnePunch, at least guys like that have criticized K2.

Or perhaps to you K2 are flawless and immune to wrong doing.

Fear not, Jacobs is bringing home the straps!!

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

That's Golovkin at 25 years of age...

Alvarez fought Floyd at 23 years of age...

sorry man, I like boxing

Jacobs bout to deliver the pain!

Yo mah dood, I need you to stop being a gay and take Maxi off ignore so we can have some fun.

Come on, get to it.

[kafkod]

They are trying to beat Bhops record, that's ggg's call, and his manager and promoter have to play it. Nothing wrong with avoiding difficult fights to achieve that goal, but it will be scrutinized just like the vast opinions for other fighters. Follow the role of poster, OnePunch, at least guys like that have criticized K2.

Or perhaps to you K2 are flawless and immune to wrong doing.

Fear not, Jacobs is bringing home the straps!!

You're ducking the question.

GGG doesn't need to fight Danny Jacobs to beat BHop's record and if he hadn't given Danny more than his mandated split to make the fight he could have moved on and fought somebody easier instead.

So if he's trying to avoid southpaws, and Jacobs can fight southpaw, then why did Golovkin go out of his way to get Danny into the ring?

[Lester Tutor]

You're ducking the question.

GGG doesn't need to fight Danny Jacobs to beat BHop's record and if he hadn't given Danny more than his mandated split to make the fight he could have moved on and fought somebody easier instead.

So if he's trying to avoid southpaws, and Jacobs can fight southpaw, then why did Golovkin go out of his way to get Danny into the ring?

Jacobs would not have forfeited his position, and the WBA mandated them to get it on. This was clear about the WBA's intentions as they did not acknowledge Golovkin defending the WBA strap against Brook.

[Lester Tutor]

Yo mah dood, I need you to stop being a gay and take Maxi off ignore so we can have some fun.

Come on, get to it.

openly racist heads go on my ignore list, nothing more.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

openly racist heads go on my ignore list, nothing more.

That **** is for the weak. Come on, you know you laugh at some of the **** he posts.

Have you not seen his threads such as the one about how Mayweather is juicing because he showed vascularity around his shoulder area?

[kafkod]

Jacobs would not have forfeited his position, and the WBA mandated them to get it on. This was clear about the WBA's intentions as they did not acknowledge Golovkin defending the WBA strap against Brook.

That's bullshit.

The WBA not sanctioning GGG/Brook had no connection with GGG/Jacobs because GGG/Jacobs hadn't even been mandated back then.


Danny petitioned the WBA asking for more than 25% if it went to a purse bid and the WBA turned him down.


If GGG didn't want to fight Jacobs all he had to do was not offer him any more than 25% and if Danny didn't accept it the WBA would have removed him as GGG's mando.

[Lester Tutor]

That's bullshit.

The WBA not sanctioning GGG/Brook had no connection with GGG/Jacobs because GGG/Jacobs hadn't even been mandated back then.


Danny petitioned the WBA asking for more than 25% if it went to a purse bid and the WBA turned him down.


If GGG didn't want to fight Jacobs all he had to do was not offer him any more than 25% and if Danny didn't accept it the WBA would have removed him as GGG's mando.

K2 had to face Jacobs for the simple fact they needed Jacobs for any leverage negotiations with GBP-Alvarez. Loeffler had made that clear, that it gives them leverage to get the "bigger fights." Also K2 were too pressured into facing a top and recognized Middleweight. Golovkin had also acknowledged how facing Jacobs was a good thing... if Golovkin didn't fight Jacobs it would've been real bad press against K2 considering "negotiations" and irony.

I have Jacobs beating ggg with his right cross

[kafkod]

K2 had to face Jacobs for the simple fact they needed Jacobs for any leverage negotiations with GBP-Alvarez. Loeffler had made that clear, that it gives them leverage to get the "bigger fights." Also K2 were too pressured into facing a top and recognized Middleweight. Golovkin had also acknowledged how facing Jacobs was a good thing... if Golovkin didn't fight Jacobs it would've been real bad press against K2 considering "negotiations" and irony.

I have Jacobs beating ggg with his right cross

Jacobs is nobody on the world scene. Beating him won't improve GGG's leverage with Canelo. Beating BJS and holding all the titles at MW is what GGG needs to improve leverage with Canelo.That one will be happening in June.

If GGG was trying to avoid Danny Jacobs he wouldn't have offered him more money to fight and risked losing the big ones with BJS and Canelo.

[OnePunch]

Jacobs is nobody on the world scene. Beating him won't improve GGG's leverage with Canelo. Beating BJS and holding all the titles at MW is what GGG needs to improve leverage with Canelo.That one will be happening in June.

If GGG was trying to avoid Danny Jacobs he wouldn't have offered him more money to fight and risked losing the big ones with BJS and Canelo.

exactly. They would have let the Jacobs fight go to bid, watched Jacobs vacate rather than accept the 25%, and then K2 would have thrown big money at Saunders