Meh, anybody can pick somebody up from the front in a bear hug...
I'm talking about squatting - a proper squat where you take your ass parallel to the ground, with the bar containing weights across your back.
Dam tiny little chicken legs simply COULD NOT support more than a 45 pound plate, and a 25 pound plate on each side of a 45 pound bar (for a total of 185 pounds). That would be his one-rep max.
Manute Boll's one-rep max initially was only like 95 pounds lol. Maybe not even that - it was pathetic how weak he was.
These guys with chicken leg genetics should kill themselves before they spread their seed.
The WBC should order Ortiz and Stiverne to fight for the eliminator, if Stiverne declines, then it should be the next two at the top to fight.
**** this bull****. **** the corrupt WBC. They're the biggest jokes alongside the WBA in this sport.
The WBC wanted Stiverne to face Ortiz. Don King said no and took the legal position that it wasn't Stiverne's fault Povetkin doped and that Stiverne should be named mandatory since there hasn't been a mandatory in two years.
While the WBC was deliberating, a judge ruled that Wilder was entitled to his entire purse for the canceled Povetkin fight since Povetkin doped.
After that ruling, if you are the WBC, do you really want to go into court to fight Don King? Big risk with zero reward. No, the wise thing to do is to just name Stiverne the mandatory.
The WBC wanted Stiverne to face Ortiz. Don King said no and took the legal position that it wasn't Stiverne's fault Povetkin doped and that Stiverne should be named mandatory since there hasn't been a mandatory in two years.
While the WBC was deliberating, a judge ruled that Wilder was entitled to his entire purse for the canceled Povetkin fight since Povetkin doped.
After that ruling, if you are the WBC, do you really want to go into court to fight Don King? Big risk with zero reward. No, the wise thing to do is to just name Stiverne the mandatory.
I don't think Stiverne and King have a leg to stand on. Not when you consider the fact that Stiverne also failed a drug test in the lead-up to the Povetkin fight.
The WBC wanted Stiverne to face Ortiz. Don King said no and took the legal position that it wasn't Stiverne's fault Povetkin doped and that Stiverne should be named mandatory since there hasn't been a mandatory in two years.
While the WBC was deliberating, a judge ruled that Wilder was entitled to his entire purse for the canceled Povetkin fight since Povetkin doped.
After that ruling, if you are the WBC, do you really want to go into court to fight Don King? Big risk with zero reward. No, the wise thing to do is to just name Stiverne the mandatory.
You seem to think its the WBC that are paying Wilders purse? Like they're suddenly going nearly bankrupt (again) and dont want to fight Don King in the courts.
Its the Russian having to pay the purse, hence he's appealing it left right and center. This little snippet from the WBC's own regulations might be a good read for you.
3.9 Elimination Bouts.
The WBC may order one or more qualifying or elimination bouts and
tournaments to determine ratings and to select the boxers that will compete in a final elimination bout to designate an official mandatory challenger. Therefore, elimination bouts do not necessarily result in the designation of an official mandatory challenger, and the winner of an elimination bout does not become mandatory challenger, unless such bout has been sanctioned by the WBC explicitly as a “final elimination” bout. Only the winner of a final elimination bout shall become a mandatory challenger, and shall be subject to the provisions of these Rules & Regulations and such additional conditions and exceptions as may be imposed by the WBC in its discretion on a case-by-case basis.
The WBC are in bed with Don King and have been for years!!!
How could this even be considered remotely Deontay Wilder's fault by some boxing fans really amazes me? He is being pressured by the WBC to defend the title against Bermane Stiverne at the behest of one Don King.
His goal was to always unify the titles starting with Joseph Parker's WBO's belt and then ending with the winner of the Anthony Joshua/Wladimir Klitschko championship bout for those titles.
It's a good rematch to make. I'd like to see if Stiverne was as wrecked from over training in the first fight as he said or if he just has no good answer for Wilder's reach and power.
I think Stiverne is a way better fighter than what he put on display in his loss to Deontay.
Would probably pick Wilder to UD him again, but in a tougher scrap this time around.
It's a good rematch to make. I'd like to see if Stiverne was as wrecked from over training in the first fight as he said or if he just has no good answer for Wilder's reach and power.
I think Stiverne is a way better fighter than what he put on display in his loss to Deontay.
Would probably pick Wilder to UD him again, but in a tougher scrap this time around.
no its not. first fight was boring and stirverne has had one fight since in which he looked like a bum and barely won.
i think hes worse. hes known for beating face first arreola twice. thats it. he was even losing to 50 year old ray austin before scoring the late ko. its safe to say this guy is not very good. if you need more evidence he even made wilder look like a competent boxer when they fought. im pretty sure the guy who fights once every 2 years was not overtraining. overeating sure.
Comment