Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford Could Fight Granados Next Instead of Felix Diaz

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    If GGG was fighting a guy coming off a loss most of ya'll would be killing him. Unified champs are held to a higher standard as they should be. Be consistent is all I ask.

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
      If GGG was fighting a guy coming off a loss most of ya'll would be killing him. Unified champs are held to a higher standard as they should be. Be consistent is all I ask.
      Certain fighters are held to a higher standard...

      All losses aren't created equal, regardless of what the record says, you know that.

      No shame in losing the way kovalev or this granados kid lost.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
        The Lomachenko fight is never gonna happen. 135 is probably the highest he'll get. Maybe 140 towards the end of his career. The Garcia fight is at least a year away if it even happens at all.
        I'm a superfight guy. There's too many divisions and way too many belts. So when elite fighters, which Crawford, Mikey, and Lomachenko are, are with two divisions of each other, I wanna see them matched up. I have little to no interest in seeing them beat up on guys in these watered down divisions. In an era of eight divisions and one title per, most of these "champions" y'all wanna see these guys like Crawford "unify" with wouldn't even be fringe contenders. Just because you put "unification" on the fight poster doesn't mean its not an elite fighter fighting a bum. I wanna see the best fight the best.

        Comment


        • #94
          Only reason the Granados fight is **** is because of the type of caliber Crawford is.

          So yea, I agree this is a pretty **** fight.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by FLY TY View Post
            Certain fighters are held to a higher standard...

            All losses aren't created equal, regardless of what the record says, you know that.

            No shame in losing the way kovalev or this granados kid lost.
            That's why I said if you're the guy who gave him a loss & it's a rematch then it's cool. I hold unified champions to a very high standard. I expect Anna and demand more from Crawford than a guy coming off a loss a division higher . His own trainer said there's nothing at 140

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
              If GGG was fighting a guy coming off a loss most of ya'll would be killing him. Unified champs are held to a higher standard as they should be. Be consistent is all I ask.
              The thing that kills me about most of you belt freaks is the hypocrisy. Not attacking you personally, because I'm not familiar with you. But a lot of these same cats running around acting as if the belts are the tell all/end all, are the same guys that b1tched about Floyd's competition throughout his career, mostly his work as a welterweight. When the truth is, Post-Gatti, you'd be hard pressed to find more than a handful of fights Floyd fought that wasn't a unification, he was facing a reigning beltholder, or facing a mandatory challenger. Its just mind boggling to me that Floyd's belt collecting wasn't well received. Buy a guy like GGG is applauded
              Especially when Floyd's competition was far superior to GGG's.

              Comment


              • #97
                So wait is matthysse coming back at 140?

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by hitking View Post
                  I'm a superfight guy. There's too many divisions and way too many belts. So when elite fighters, which Crawford, Mikey, and Lomachenko are, are with two divisions of each other, I wanna see them matched up. I have little to no interest in seeing them beat up on guys in these watered down divisions. In an era of eight divisions and one title per, most of these "champions" y'all wanna see these guys like Crawford "unify" with wouldn't even be fringe contenders. Just because you put "unification" on the fight poster doesn't mean its not an elite fighter fighting a bum. I wanna see the best fight the best.
                  These fights happen, but they take time. It's no use finding 2 elite fighters then having them have trilogies and more. Burns is the closest thing to tc in the division and he was brutalized already. Diaz is a quality fighter but no super fight.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    crawford turning into a cherry picker. His cv is overrated anyway, his best win is postol and who did postol beat?- a shot matthyse. As i said before, theres a reason he decides to fight at 140 not 147

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
                      If GGG was fighting a guy coming off a loss most of ya'll would be killing him. Unified champs are held to a higher standard as they should be. Be consistent is all I ask.
                      If he fought Dominic Wade again because Wade held a paper title we would be killing him too. Pot meet kettle. According to you, fighting inferior fighters multiple times is ok as long as they get paper titles. Your acknowledgement of paper champions is what's destroying boxing.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP