Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A little throwback quote from Golovkin

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::. View Post
    They were willing to go higher for Chavez and Froch but not Ward? I don't get it. Oh wait, yea I do. We all know what's going on here.
    Why don't you get it, dummy? You make full weight concessions for guys that bring much to the table.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
      Belts in 4 weight classes.

      You could make a good argument that his legacy is better than Lil g's right now.

      Don't know if I would, but it's out there.
      OK so he doesn't have elite names on his resume. Thanks for the confirmation

      Comment


      • Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::. View Post
        koolkc107 Manhandling these boys all on his own. I like this guy.
        The guy is a joke and you're left cheerleading that clown. Sad!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
          You don't get to say you will go to 154 for one guy, but then say you can't do 155 for a guy the smaller guy beat.
          155 is not a weight division doe.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
            OK so he doesn't have elite names on his resume. Thanks for the confirmation
            Two of them are losses but they are there.

            His welterweight strap came at the hands of a future HOFer.

            And Broner has as good or better resume in his last 10 or 11 fights as Golovkin's whole career.

            Your welcome.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by BreWall View Post
              155 is not a weight division doe.
              154 to 168 is a range of weights.

              Catchweights are implied, I would think.

              Mebbe that's just me trying to be logical, I guess...

              Comment


              • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                The guy is a joke and you're left cheerleading that clown. Sad!
                The only joke here is you trying to defend the indefensible.

                And resorting to insults when you realize you cannot.

                It is very obvious.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
                  Two of them are losses but they are there.

                  His welterweight strap came at the hands of a future HOFer.

                  And Broner has as good or better resume in his last 10 or 11 fights as Golovkin's whole career.

                  Your welcome.
                  . Future HOF Paulie? And you get upset for getting called clown lol. @jsdf26 come cheerlead this

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
                    154 to 168 is a range of weights.

                    Catchweights are implied, I would think.

                    Mebbe that's just me trying to be logical, I guess...
                    He's not dropping down to 155 for a MW mando challenge and 3 MW belts + lineal. Wtf is wrong with you? Go learn some respect for the sport, jackas

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                      He's not dropping down to 155 for a MW mando challenge and 3 MW belts + lineal. Wtf is wrong with you? Go learn some respect for the sport, jackas
                      What, you mean like Maravilla did twice and Cotto once?

                      If it was OK for those guys to defend the lineal at catchweights, why not Canelo?

                      And why broadcast before even any negotiation begins that you aren't budging from 160?

                      That's what Golovkin did.

                      Doesn't sound like a guy confident he can beat anyone in 3 weight classes to me...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP