Would boxing be better with less divisions?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Madison Boxing
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 35364
    • 6,455
    • 3,367
    • 190,590

    #1

    Would boxing be better with less divisions?

    Would the sport be in a better position if divisions like jr lightweight, jr middleweight, super middleweight were scrapped? I dont see why theres so many divisions.

    Is 6 pounds really that much between jr middle and middleweight for example, is it really some insurmountable weight difference? Is there that big a difference in stature between a 140 fighter and a 147 fighter? a 168 fighter and a 175 fighter?

    I dont see why they couldnt just put in a few pounds of muscle, doubt the frame is that much different. And if you are slightly smaller, tough luck really, the size difference shouldnt mean that you cant compete.

    After all, we have so many multi division world champions these days that i dont really think there is huge size differences between the divisions, and its obviously pretty easy to move up in weight if youve got the quality.

    I dont really see it as a huge deal when someone moves up from jr lightweight to lightweight for example, they may aswell be the same ****ing division for all i care.

    UFC havent bothered with all these junior and super divisions and that seems to be doing okay. If anything weight and pure physical strength is more important in there because of the grappling.

    I feel all it does is stretch the quality in the sport, can get people yo-yo'ing in between divisions and some hiding out in weak divisions.

    For example,

    What you could be looking at is a light heavy division with kovalev, jack, stevenson, ward, degale, beterbiev, ramirez.

    A middleweight division with golovkin, canelo, charlo, jacobs, eubank, andrade, lara, saunders, cotto.

    Surely that would result in better fights throughout. And what you'd be looking it as solid fights throughout the division, even at fringe world level, because it would be literally twice as hard to get to the top of the division. WIth such depth to the divisions, mismatches would be more inexcusable

    So what do people think? Is there really a need for these super and junior divisions? WHy were they brought in in the first place?
  • yammy25
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2016
    • 2648
    • 136
    • 49
    • 18,103

    #2
    Originally posted by bigdramashow

    UFC havent bothered with all these junior and super divisions and that seems to be doing okay. If anything weight and pure physical strength is more important in there because of the grappling.
    The UFC featherweight division is the welterweight boxing division.. its 19 lbs over what a featherweight actually is.

    The UFC divisional names mean absolutely ****e all other than to as a means of promotion and theyve admitted as much.

    Comment

    • original zero
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2016
      • 2243
      • 69
      • 1
      • 9,551

      #3
      Drama -

      I think fans would enjoy the sport more if there were fewer divisions. There are so many divisions because TV networks want world title fights. It's the same reason there are so many organizations.

      Comment

      • Reloaded
        Truth Teller
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 17097
        • 750
        • 16
        • 26,393

        #4
        No because it would give some guys a huge advantage weight wise, a guy at the low end of a division would be at a big size disadvantage to a guy at the top end.

        The more advanced boxing is becoming the more weight is coming into fights, I think the divisions are pretty good now, if you wanna make better for the fighters we could have more divisions by keeping the 4 pound range through to welterweight, then as it is go in 7s to LH .

        Comment

        • Caught Square
          CS*
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2014
          • 2518
          • 87
          • 52
          • 24,866

          #5
          Yea and less belts.

          Once Floyd was introduced as the 'WBA super world super welterweight' champion (no typo) that's when I knew for sure it's too much.

          As you said more competition in one division makes it more interesting, now these guys are split up more and can take easier paths.

          I'm not against multiple belts but the WBC, WBA and IBF is more than enough, now we have super/regular belts as well but it'll probably never change because of greedy organisations looking for sanctioning fees.
          Last edited by Caught Square; 02-16-2017, 05:38 PM.

          Comment

          • HanzGruber
            STRAPMEUP
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2011
            • 29824
            • 1,069
            • 238
            • 81,632

            #6
            obviously.

            Comment

            • AD86
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • May 2016
              • 252
              • 17
              • 56
              • 8,373

              #7
              Scrapping the number of belts would be better as the number of weight divisions but neither is going to happen.

              Comment

              • original zero
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2016
                • 2243
                • 69
                • 1
                • 9,551

                #8
                The average sports fan is never going to be able to follow or take seriously 17 divisions. It definitely hampers the sport. I'm not saying go back to the original 8 divisions. I personally would cut back to 10. Which isn't something the organizations would ever do, but if PBC eventually has a monopoly of big time US boxing, maybe they would reduce the number of divisions to make the sport easier to follow. Perhaps something like this:

                115 (FLYWEIGHT)
                120 (BANTAMWEIGHT)
                125 (FEATHERWEIGHT)
                135 (LIGHTWEIGHT)
                145 (WELTERWEIGHT)
                155 (LIGHT MIDDLEWEIGHT)
                165 (MIDDLEWEIGHT)
                175 (LIGHT HEAVYWEIGHT)
                200 (CRUISERWEIGHT)
                UNL (HEAVYWEIGHT)

                Comment

                • Ryan8777
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Nov 2016
                  • 112
                  • 6
                  • 5
                  • 6,321

                  #9
                  We need more weight divisions, something between light heavyweight and cruiserweight,175 to 200 is too much. Heavyweights are getting bigger and heavier every generation, maybe it's time for a super heavyweight division.

                  Comment

                  • DeadLikeMe
                    ................
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2011
                    • 11968
                    • 748
                    • 1,409
                    • 26,662

                    #10
                    I would be fine with eliminating every division south of 126.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP