Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Briggs-Oquendo: Purse Bid Invalid, New Date Set For February 23

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I'd like to bid a penny for Briggs and Fres then flush the toilet

    Briggs vs Fres is fricking worth zero and is a joke fight between two has been old farts without nothing to offer but belly gas and burps. Any Briggs Fres fight is an boxing enema anda baseball bat suppository.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by dantheman1983 View Post
      Here is an idea, either do this fight or the Joshua Klits one for the title, not both, thus clearing up the WBA title situation in one go. Unfortunately the WBA are money grabbing ****s and would like to continue this farce for the sake of sactioning fee's
      You appear to be unaware that US federal court issued a judgement guaranteeing Fres Oquendo a shot at the WBA world championship. The WBA has no choice in the matter.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by SteveM View Post
        If your minimum bid for a HW title is a million then don't mandate fighters of the calibre of Briggs and Oquendo to fight for the title - the fight is clearly not worth a million in today's boxing climate. Better still don't have such a straight jacket rule.

        Jeez - a smart 12 year old could see what is going wrong here.
        but it's a clever way to get out of the obligation to oquendo.

        if nobody is willing to pay the million, oquendo loses his position.

        Comment


        • #14
          We need a middle eastern evil dictator to raid his countries finances to put up the purse for this. The late Ghadafi got pop singers to sing for him for 1M US, so this could still happen.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by ScottWeiland View Post
            This is pathetic, so it's delayed for a week and the possibility and likelihood is the purses will be even less than 400k. Why the WBA didnt just ratify the 400k bid or have the second purse bid immediately afterwards is absurd. This farce of keeping Oquendo around has gone on long enough.
            they have to follow their rules to avoid a lawsuit.

            this is how it works. two purse bids and if nobody bids the minimum, the fighters risk losing their position.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by original zero View Post
              You appear to be unaware that US federal court issued a judgement guaranteeing Fres Oquendo a shot at the WBA world championship. The WBA has no choice in the matter.
              I am not unaware of this.
              My point is you can't justify this AND a WBA 'super championship' fight between AJ and Wlad. Wlad is coming off a loss and the fight isn't a real unification (IBO). The WBA are just trying to get their dirty fingers in all the pies.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by original zero View Post
                but it's a clever way to get out of the obligation to oquendo.

                if nobody is willing to pay the million, oquendo loses his position.
                Clearing the way for David Haye v Briggs or someone else

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by dantheman1983 View Post
                  I am not unaware of this.
                  My point is you can't justify this AND a WBA 'super championship' fight between AJ and Wlad. Wlad is coming off a loss and the fight isn't a real unification (IBO). The WBA are just trying to get their dirty fingers in all the pies.
                  The justification is simple. Oquendo is only owed a shot at the secondary title. He's done nothing to earn a shot at the full championship. WBA also owed an interim shot to Ustinev, a secondary shot to Browne, etc. Giant mess. So things are being done in the way that minimizes potential lawsuits and ties up all loose ends.

                  Wlad/Joshua winner takes care of the obligation to Ortiz, Briggs/Oquendo winner takes care of the obligation to Ustinev. Winners fight each other and this whole mess is resolved.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by original zero View Post
                    The justification is simple. Oquendo is only owed a shot at the secondary title. He's done nothing to earn a shot at the full championship. WBA also owed an interim shot to Ustinev, a secondary shot to Browne, etc. Giant mess. So things are being done in the way that minimizes potential lawsuits and ties up all loose ends.

                    Wlad/Joshua winner takes care of the obligation to Ortiz, Briggs/Oquendo winner takes care of the obligation to Ustinev. Winners fight each other and this whole mess is resolved.
                    That still doesn't explain why AJ and Wlad are fighting for a vacant WBA super title, if a super title is vacant and neither fighter is holding a regular WBA title makes no sense for them to create another meangingless belt

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by dantheman1983 View Post
                      That still doesn't explain why AJ and Wlad are fighting for a vacant WBA super title, if a super title is vacant and neither fighter is holding a regular WBA title makes no sense for them to create another meangingless belt
                      because fury vacated the title and wladimir was in line to fight for the vacant title. he requested that he be able to fight joshua for the vacant title. doesn't change that oquendo is still owed a secondary shot. why isn't joshua worthy of fighting for the vacant title if the leading contender makes the request?

                      the problem is so many guys are owed title shots due to the WBA having had 3 titles that just because all 3 became vacated doesn't mean you can meet all of your obligations by only crowning 1.

                      so give the WBA kudos for getting themselves from 3 to 2 and having a clear path to 1 champ.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP