Comments Thread For: Leo Santa Cruz: My Father Said No Belfast, Says I'll Get Robbed
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Yes he did. They had a SIGNED rematch clause. I guess Frampton could of threatened retirement though???Comment
-
You rasicist ***! The 1st fight plenty of ppl thought Leo won. The 2nd fight I've yet to see anyone post they thought Frampton won???
Frampton said *** No on fighting him in Cali you dumb ***. So Vegas was chosen. The 1st fight was in front of Frampton fans ANYWAYS.Comment
-
its only right/fair that he does. He cant complain about possible robbery when he just got the decision in a place carl never fought beforeLast edited by HanzGruber; 02-13-2017, 02:59 PM.Comment
-
Naw Leo doesn't have to go to Belfast anymore. Leo performance was masterful in the rematch IMO to the point that I really don't need to see a rubber match right now, not unless Frampton go beat Selby for his IBF Title impressive and/or Mares for his WBA Belt then look to maybe UNIFY!Comment
-
Leo is a solid guy, but he's blowing smoke here; not sure why
Haymon and everyone involved will help make it clear that the money is best for Leo Santa Cruz if the fight goes to Belfast (with Frampton and Hearn getting along, and McGuigan and Hearn being able to work together, the total money likely doubles anything elsewhere, tbh).
Santa Cruz's camp will likely have a heavy say in the choosing of the judges, so that shouldn't be all that much of an issue, tbh.
Sky/Sky Box Office in the UK, Showtime International in the US (with a pairing with an evening show), and a taste off of the stadium fight in Belfast of 20k-25k tickets sold is a heckuva package to back away from.
Fair judges were had in Brooklyn, fair judges were had in Las Vegas, so fair judging in Belfast isn't an impossibilityComment
-
What agreement? If Frampton woukd habe won there would be no trilogy. And save the racial slurs please.Comment
Comment