its only right/fair that he does. He cant complain about possible robbery when he just got the decision in a place carl never fought before
How is it right or fair? Vegas was a neutral. Don't pretend the last fight was some kind of robbery. Places more likely where these two would get robbed would be Mexico and Belfast.
How is it right or fair? Vegas was a neutral. Don't pretend the last fight was some kind of robbery. Places more likely where these two would get robbed would be Mexico and Belfast.
Vegas is as neutral as they come.
i didnt say it was a robbery, vegas is much closer to mex/cali than ireland is.. leo fought in vegas multiple times, it was carls first and like his third in america period
he should fight him there instead of crying about a robbery already
WBA featherweight champion Leo Santa Cruz (33-1-1, 18 KOs) would love to face travel overseas to face Carl Frampton (23-1, 14 KOs) in Belfast - but he says that important decision is not fully up to him. [Click Here To Read More]
that is a cop-out Leo
that is admitting that a rematch would be razor-close
What agreement? If Frampton woukd habe won there would be no trilogy. And save the racial slurs please.
Get a grip ladies, I'm not racist in the slightest. Answering a comment that accused my fellow countrymen of short changing the visiting fighter. If somebody wants to start a negative conversation based on nationality I'll answer with the same tone. Capisci?
Don't bleat on about how Santa Cruz is fighting away from home. Vegas is ~250 (3.5hr drive) miles from LA. Frampton has travelled to America twice and and Vegas is ~5,000 (11hr flight) miles away. Vegas is much more home to LSC that it is Frampton.
The publicised verbal agreement (which both men have publicly acknowledged) which brought Frampton to Vegas in return for an Irish battle should Frampton lose. Dress it up however you like, but LSC is not doing the honourable thing now that he's avenged his loss. He wants it all on his terms. Typical American behaviour!
Comment