brook v spence - history repeating itself...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ray*
    Be safe!!!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 44867
    • 1,654
    • 1,608
    • 558,890

    #11
    Originally posted by NaijaD
    I was going to say the same thing, people did say Brook would get destroyed but I didn't recall anyone saying he would avoid Porter.

    How does a mandatory challenger avoid the champion? .... that's a rare scenario indeed.
    I agree with you, I definitely remember people picking Porter at the time especially with him coming off the Pauline M KO. So am not sure how anyone would accuse a mandatory of ducking the champ. Not sure why some people feel the need to rewrite history, just because there are people out here, who actually wants to see a Brook v Spence fight.

    Comment

    • RomanReigns
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2016
      • 2975
      • 243
      • 361
      • 49,773

      #12
      Brooks only had 1 legit win against good competition. If Spence beats him. He already have the better resume.

      Comment

      • SkillspayBills
        Garlic Butter Gang!
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Aug 2007
        • 29181
        • 2,155
        • 3,739
        • 61,188

        #13
        I definitely thought Porter would beat Brook but that's because I never heard of the guy. He is a solid fighter who deserves respect as one of the top WWs. There's levels to this though. Spence will show that he is SPECIAL

        Comment

        • NaijaD
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 3444
          • 204
          • 215
          • 30,256

          #14
          Originally posted by Ray*
          I agree with you, I definitely remember people picking Porter at the time especially with him coming off the Pauline M KO. So am not sure how anyone would accuse a mandatory of ducking the champ. Not sure why some people feel the need to rewrite history, just because there are people out here, who actually wants to see a Brook v Spence fight.
          Exactly I don't even recall people saying Wilder would duck Stiverne and we all know his track record on facing top opposition. If you've never had a title before and you're the mandatory, it's a no brainer to take the shot.

          If the TS had his way this fight would not be happening.

          Comment

          • Mequetrefe
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2016
            • 1274
            • 56
            • 0
            • 14,670

            #15
            Brook For the win!!

            Comment

            • RomanReigns
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2016
              • 2975
              • 243
              • 361
              • 49,773

              #16
              Originally posted by Mequetrefe
              Brook For the win!!
              Nah. Spence would be the first boxer to KO Brook.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 49442
                • 5,022
                • 269
                • 104,043

                #17
                Brook was his mandatory he was never accused of ducking Porter.

                Porter (or the IBF champion) was the fight they were looking for for ages.

                Comment

                • LockardTheGOAT
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2016
                  • 1224
                  • 48
                  • 6
                  • 13,545

                  #18
                  I have nothing against Spence, however I'd laugh at all the butthurt folks who will make excuses for him if he loses this one.

                  Errol "The Hype" Spence it is until he actually beats somebody with a pulse. Now is his chance.

                  Comment

                  • RomanReigns
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2016
                    • 2975
                    • 243
                    • 361
                    • 49,773

                    #19
                    Originally posted by LockardTheGOAT
                    I have nothing against Spence, however I'd laugh at all the butthurt folks who will make excuses for him if he loses this one.

                    Errol "The Hype" Spence it is until he actually beats somebody with a pulse. Now is his chance.
                    Same with Golovkin. Both of their resume sucks. If Jacobs beat him he is out of the top ten.

                    Comment

                    • Kigali
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jun 2016
                      • 17128
                      • 263
                      • 0
                      • 19,441

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Mequetrefe
                      Brook For the win!!
                      Lil latina always pulling against the Americans.

                      Go back to messico THEN hate.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP