Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which boxer in their prime would never lose to another fighter?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by soul_survivor View PostI'm not saying ALi wasnt great in the 70s, he just wasnt prime. If you think he was you just dont know what Ali was like in the 60s. Plain as day.
I wont go over it again.
@23:23
There is nothing to go over anyone who TRULY studies footage and watches Ali will know he was better in the 70's ...running around the ring doesnt dictate a better fighter,a better fighter also has better punching and uses ring Iq and has better physical atributes....boxing 101!
Comment
-
-
People here are saying that X fighter can't be picked because he lost in his prime despite some of them losing by injuries, lack of training and long layoffs.
Vitali Klitschko is one of the toughest guys to beat H2H in heavyweight with Tyson, Lennox and a prime fleet footed Muhammad Ali.
Ricardo Lopez wouldn't be beaten by anyone in his division.
I think only Carbajal and Gonzales could beat each other in their primes.
A prime Jones from 160-168 is one of the toughest guys to beat.
Cruiserweight is in the best time in the history of the division, but until i see what these guys are capable of i don't think any cruiser could beat Holyfield.
At 154 i don't pick more than 5 fighters to beat Hearns and the same applies to Tszyu and Pryor at 140 and Duran and Whitaker at 135.
Comment
-
Originally posted by j0zef View PostRJJ is my final answer.
He is a pitiful joke now and it breaks my heart but it doesnt change what he was in the nineties. People dont realize it but he stopped knocking people out when he was fully capable of it because he was afraid of hurting them. What happened to Gerald McClellan effected him greatly. He has stayed way too long and there is a generation of boxing fans that have no idea what it was like to watch him live and in his prime. We will never see anything like him again i dont think but one can hope.
Comment
Comment