Andre Ward explains gg 50/50 "fair" offer
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
It's pretty simple. If the fighter has nothing to offer financially or in legacy it's not a duck. Golovkin had nothing to offer Ward in 2012/2013. Both would have gained financially and in legacy in 2015, that's when Golovkin decided he didn't want the risk and ducked.Comment
-
It's pretty simple. If the fighter has nothing to offer financially or in legacy it's not a duck. Golovkin had nothing to offer Ward in 2012/2013. Both would have gained financially and in legacy in 2015, that's when Golovkin decided he didn't want the risk and ducked.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
It's pretty simple. If the fighter has nothing to offer financially or in legacy it's not a duck. Golovkin had nothing to offer Ward in 2012/2013. Both would have gained financially and in legacy in 2015, that's when Golovkin decided he didn't want the risk and ducked.Comment
-
Good to see you're consistent. In reality, what you're saying is...if it's a fighter i like it's not a duck, but if it's a fighter i don't like it's a duck. I don't know what ggg or his fans did to some of you guys...but it's funny to see you spend day in and day out posting about him.Comment
-
Comment
Comment