GGG would put Tito to sleep at 160. Trinidad was never really as impressive at MW like he was at 147 and 154. He was also getting dropped by smaller Welterweights and he's not exactly hard to hit himself.
Trinidad: ''He Saved Himself In Not Fighting Me'' / Golovkin
Collapse
-
-
No you listen dipshyt or learn how to read I asked who joppy beat for u to rate so highly not his accomplishments I know what they are and who he fought to achieve them (I could easily rip them to shreds) so ill try again pay attention WHO DID JOPPY BEAT for u to rate him so highly because if you just list gggs credentials and leave out who he fought he sounds like a atg (obviously he's not)Listen dipshyt you quoted me I answered you and gave his credentials now tell me who on GGGs resume you want to trot out as better because ggg won paper belts, was elevated to champ for 2 of his belts outside the ring. The only champ he beat for a belt was lemiuex who just won a paper belt his fight before. Joppy > anyone ggg has beaten. Again this is more a sign of how terrible the opposition GGG has faced then a declaration that Joppy is some all time great. But he was more respected then the jokers ggg faced, a champ for half a decade, in his prime only 1 loss which was contraversal and he avenged it. Lemiuex had already been beaten twice by borderline bums before GGG beat him. Joppy > Lemiuex. Now go ahead and pick another fighter and we can do the same song and dance because we both know GGG resume is paper thin and littered with C and D class fighters. A GGG fan boy downplaying a Joppy win is hilarious to me.Last edited by peakbay; 02-04-2017, 12:03 PM.Comment
-
-
Could Tito beat Amar Amari? Was Joppy better than Amari?
Was Amar Amari vs Golovkin a mythical UD bout?
Comment
-
No he doesn't if you list GGGs credentials they include not lineal champ, 2 of his belts were elevated to him outside the ring, only 1 belt was won in the ring against a paper champ who won a vacant belt the fight before. So go ahead cupcake and list the opponents who you think beat better fighters before GGG then joppy or has a better resume. Stop dancing around chump. You list who think was a better opponent on GGGs resume?No you listen dipshyt or learn how to read I asked who joppy beat for u to rate so highly not his accomplishments I know what they are and who he fought to achieve them (I could easily rip them to shreds) so ill try again pay attention WHO DID JOPPY BEAT for u to rate him so highly because if you just list gggs credentials and leave out who he fought he sounds like a atg (obviously he's not)
Joppy >>> more impressive win than anyone GGG has beaten
The fact you have gone this long and still can't produce 1 name on a career middleweight resume who is 35 years old proves my point about how bad GGG level of competition has been.Last edited by bigdunny1; 02-04-2017, 12:19 PM.Comment
-
Who gives a shit is a better question. None of that has anything to do with what happens if Golovkin and Tito ever got in the ring. I mean the delusion has reached the point that people are picking a guy who was best at WW to knock a guy out who by all reports has never been down in his entire boxing career. Just let it go man, Golovkin will lose one day and then all you dip shits will get to crow about how you were right all along and how much of a hype job he was. Pitiful excuses for boxing fans really.Comment
-
Ok, I'll make it easier for you my son.Who gives a shit is a better question. None of that has anything to do with what happens if Golovkin and Tito ever got in the ring. I mean the delusion has reached the point that people are picking a guy who was best at WW to knock a guy out who by all reports has never been down in his entire boxing career. Just let it go man, Golovkin will lose one day and then all you dip shits will get to crow about how you were right all along and how much of a hype job he was. Pitiful excuses for boxing fans really.
Let's say it's 2006. Before Amari, Gardner, or Boudla ever fought Golovkin. What if we were to ask, ''Will Amar, Gardner or Boudla stand a chance with Golovkin?''
Then again, as you say, the mythical approach would be, ''hells no, none of them would stand in there with Golovkin...''
yet there was a UD, and ironically GGG guzzlers say, ''NO Tito would get destroyed.''
So how does that work?
Or are you just going to dodge the questions again? Don'T be scared bruhComment
-
Who is scared? I answered your question just not how you wanted me to. Amar, gardner nor Boulda have anything to do with how a fight between Golovkin and Tito would go. As much as you would like it to be so it isnt. I mean you are so desperate to discredit Golovkin you are trying to make fights he won into loses because he didnt knock them out. Its comical in a desperate sad way.Ok, I'll make it easier for you my son.
Let's say it's 2006. Before Amari, Gardner, or Boudla ever fought Golovkin. What if we were to ask, ''Will Amar, Gardner or Boudla stand a chance with Golovkin?''
Then again, as you say, the mythical approach would be, ''hells no, none of them would stand in there with Golovkin...''
yet there was a UD, and ironically GGG guzzlers say, ''NO Tito would get destroyed.''
So how does that work?
Or are you just going to dodge the questions again? Don'T be scared bruhComment
-
So u cant answer the question and have to change the subject haha lame if u list ggg credentials they include not lineal champ wtf does that mean u going full re tardNo he doesn't if you list GGGs credentials they include not lineal champ, 2 of his belts were elevated to him outside the ring, only 1 belt was won in the ring against a paper champ who won a vacant belt the fight before. So go ahead cupcake and list the opponents who you think beat better fighters before GGG then joppy or has a better resume. Stop dancing around chump. You list who think was a better opponent on GGGs resume?
Joppy >>> more impressive win than anyone GGG has beatenComment
Comment