Trinidad: ''He Saved Himself In Not Fighting Me'' / Golovkin

[bigdunny1]

Lol, these fools want Golovkin to lose so bad they are making up mythical loses. Tito was a hell of a WW and a good Jr MW, Golovkin stomps his ass at MW and everyone of you know it.

BS I don't even know that he beats canelo, ward, froch, prime sergio and a ton of other top fighters around his weight because he never fought them. YOU DONT GET CREDIT FOR FIGHTS YOU DIDNT WIN. We only know he beats C and D class fighters because that's all he's proven. But sure beating guys like lemiux is just like beating all time greats like tito. SMH Especially when tito never lost to a head first no defense fighter like ggg ever. Tito had power at 160 and only lost to skilled technicians who had skillset to outbox him. Hopkins and winky if they fought like GGG would of been put to sleep. He wasn't too small or not powerful enough he wasn't skilled enough just like in the Oscar fight. Fighters who were skilled to oubox and not stand in front to trade gave him problems. GGG don't have skills and defense like oscar and hopkins to do that. And if brook can phuk up GGG face and he don't Crack anywhere near like tito can GGG would be in trouble.

[bigdunny1]

Tito would be the best fighter GGG ever fought by a yuuuuge margin.

GGG would be the third best MIDDLEWEIGHT tito fought and somewhere in the bottom top ten of best fighters Tito faced.

Think about that.

That's exactly what I'm trying to point out to these idiots. And from a fighting style GGG is tailor made for tito he only struggled with guys who moved and we're extremely difficult to hit, guys who tactically refused to stand and trade with tito to frustrate him. GGG doesn't fight like that or have those skillsets and has one of the worst defense he's just fought worst competition to get away with it.

[Sun_Tzu]

BS I don't even know that he beats canelo, ward, froch, prime sergio and a ton of other top fighters around his weight because he never fought them. YOU DONT GET CREDIT FOR FIGHTS YOU DIDNT WIN. We only know he beats C and D class fighters because that's all he's proven. But sure beating guys like lemiux is just like beating all time greats like tito. SMH Especially when tito never lost to a head first no defense fighter like ggg ever. Tito had power at 160 and only lost to skilled technicians who had skillset to outbox him. Hopkins and winky if they fought like GGG would of been put to sleep. He wasn't too small or not powerful enough he wasn't skilled enough just like in the Oscar fight. Fighters who were skilled to oubox and not stand in front to trade gave him problems. GGG don't have skills and defense like oscar and hopkins to do that. And if brook can phuk up GGG face and he don't Crack anywhere near like tito can GGG would be in trouble.

Lol, Ill leave you guys to your GGG haters fan club circle jerk.

[Lester Tutor]

Who is scared? I answered your question just not how you wanted me to. Amar, gardner nor Boulda have anything to do with how a fight between Golovkin and Tito would go. As much as you would like it to be so it isnt. I mean you are so desperate to discredit Golovkin you are trying to make fights he won into loses because he didnt knock them out. Its comical in a desperate sad way.

Dude stop being in denial. It's a shame you call yourself a boxing fan. Just because I make it an effort to mock dogmatic approaches to Golovkin doesn't mean I don'T like the guy. What sucks is fans with the same fever of unbeatable Pacquiao. Excuses after excuses this is nothing new. Ironically we said Pac lost twice even before meeting with Morales I, but anything after that the narrative from Top Rank and Pactiardism went into full effect that he could never lose. These bandwagoners, as it was said in 2015, crossed over to Golovkin. posterboyism

So again, I'm going to ask you. Do you think Amar Amari, Ian Gardner, or Boudla were better than Tito at 160?

It's a simple yes or no. I understand how this logic can spook you in acknowledging Tito over them.

[DocGreenThumb.]

Didn't Tito have Winky Wright problems. Or did all of you GGG Haters just for get that. Got schooled the whole fight and hes supposed to beat GGG. Ok whatever

[Sun_Tzu]

Dude stop being in denial. It's a shame you call yourself a boxing fan. Just because I make it an effort to mock dogmatic approaches to Golovkin doesn't mean I don'T like the guy. What sucks is fans with the same fever of unbeatable Pacquiao. Excuses after excuses this is nothing new. Ironically we said Pac lost twice even before meeting with Morales I, but anything after that the narrative from Top Rank and Pactiardism went into full effect that he could never lose. These bandwagoners, as it was said in 2015, crossed over to Golovkin. posterboyism

So again, I'm going to ask you. Do you think Amar Amari, Ian Gardner, or Boudla were better than Tito at 160?

It's a simple yes or no. I understand how this logic can spook you in acknowledging Tito over them.

Are you seriously asking me if I think Tito Trinidad, one of the best WW of the last 25 years is better than three guys Ive barely heard of? What am I in denial of by the way? Tito was a monster at Welter, odds are he isnt going to be able to impose his will on Golovkin at MW, two weight divisions higher than his best weight. The odds are Golovkin bounces Tito off the canvas early and often. I dont really see what the problem is. Tito was not a true MW.

[bigdunny1]

Didn't Tito have Winky Wright problems. Or did all of you GGG Haters just for get that. Got schooled the whole fight and hes supposed to beat GGG. Ok whatever

Does GGG fight like winky? And we all know a prime winky does the same thing to GGG. That's like saying canelo had Floyd problems so cotto should beat him right? I mean cotto fight with Floyd was much closer then canelo. Problem is cotto fights NOTHING like Floyd so he couldnt do those things and got whooped by canelo. Just like tito losing to winky and Hopkins fighting style, guys who are better then GGG and have as opposite a fighting style. GGG can't replicate ANYTHING Hopkins and Winky did to outbox tito. And GGG loses to both prime Hopkins and Winky.

[-Lowkey-]

There would only be one outcome a Golovkin stoppage victory.

He would control the fight with his jab and break Tito down and choose when to end the fight.

[Fists_of_Fury]

Lol, these fools want Golovkin to lose so bad they are making up mythical loses. Tito was a hell of a WW and a good Jr MW, Golovkin stomps his ass at MW and everyone of you know it.

Not gonna lie... I do want GGG to lose or at the very least pursue the fights to warrant the hype. All his moronic fanboys have made it that way just like the #48ers (although Manny is a great fighter). GGG has beaten nobody at all to warrant even half the hype this bum beater gets. He's a 1 division paper title holder ffs! His resume has 0 A class names! He is 35 years old! His team have been proven to be liars and the hold up to fights... they have received offers, but morons say dey be duckin doe.

Brook was touching up GGG and he's ****e compared to Tito. Ouma was touching him up. And the list goes on with bums even touching him up. GGG is easy to hit... Tito had legit middleweight power too. I heard morons say he didn't but guys like Joppy beg to differ. Hopkins had to fight dirty to beat Tito. Winky and Hopkins both would beat GGG with ease too. Tito would not easily get knocked out by anyone with the limited skillset of GGG. Imo 154lb Undefeated Vargas is a better fighter than GGG and we see how he easily KO'd Tito

[Tankdestroyer]

Trinidad needs to tend to his roosters and stop dreaming. Like others have posted he didn't do much at middleweight...
Joppy: was overmatched
Hopkins: lost by tko
Cherifi: ???(no need of mentioning)
Mayorga: joke fight at 160
Winky: lost by UD(i don't think tito deserved a rd)
So there's tito's *****ty resume at 160. Tito should have stayed at 154!