Comments Thread For: Judge Rules Against Golden Boy in Its Lawsuit Against Al Haymon

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aboutfkntime
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2015
    • 47365
    • 1,631
    • 3,563
    • 391,308

    #271
    the only mofo breaching the Ali act is Dana White


    McGregor Feels Ali Act Can Prevent UFC Blocking Mayweather Deal
    As previously reported on BoxingScene.com, Floyd Mayweather Jr. says facing UFC star Conor McGregor in a boxing ring “can happen” and is something that would “g






    and anyone who thinks that the Ali act doesn't apply to UFC, is clearly racist LMAO



    Comment

    • snoopymiller
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Jun 2007
      • 367
      • 13
      • 0
      • 6,575

      #272
      Originally posted by OnePunch
      I dont think it is an assumption that he has a "financial interest" in his events. Even if by some miracle he donated all profits to charity or whatever, the simple fact of him contracting a promoter at a set fee automatically gives him a "financial interest" in the event. And a DIRECT interest at that. I just dont see how that can be refuted. And a manager having such a financial interest in a promotional event indeed violates that Act. The language is pretty clear.

      Now whether or not the Justice Dept or a court somewhere ever actually DOES anything about it, well thats anyones guess my friend........
      What an idiot... if nobody is getting damaged there is no reason for anybody to do anything about it.

      Comment

      • OnePunch
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 9081
        • 1,295
        • 748
        • 2,453,131

        #273
        Originally posted by snoopymiller
        What an idiot... if nobody is getting damaged there is no reason for anybody to do anything about it.
        what a brilliant legal analysis.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #274
          Originally posted by OnePunch
          I dont think it is an assumption that he has a "financial interest" in his events. Even if by some miracle he donated all profits to charity or whatever, the simple fact of him contracting a promoter at a set fee automatically gives him a "financial interest" in the event. And a DIRECT interest at that. I just dont see how that can be refuted. And a manager having such a financial interest in a promotional event indeed violates that Act. The language is pretty clear.

          Now whether or not the Justice Dept or a court somewhere ever actually DOES anything about it, well thats anyones guess my friend........
          Financial interest under what title? Not promoter. I mean, come on, man.

          Comment

          • snoopymiller
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Jun 2007
            • 367
            • 13
            • 0
            • 6,575

            #275
            Originally posted by OnePunch
            what a brilliant legal analysis.
            Its pretty simple Terry.

            No judge or jury in their right mind would deem Haymon as violating the Ali Act based on $$$ fighters are receiving compared to their peers with other managers and promoters.

            Are all boxing promoters this dumb?

            Comment

            • snoopymiller
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jun 2007
              • 367
              • 13
              • 0
              • 6,575

              #276
              What world do we live in when people expect a judge to rule against anybody who is paying fighters more than their opposition?

              Prosecution would happen if fighters were getting stiffed Arum - style but this is obviously not the case with Haymon.

              ******ity abounds.

              Comment

              • lizard_man
                Undisputed Champion
                • Jul 2008
                • 2594
                • 368
                • 20
                • 48,631

                #277
                Originally posted by snoopymiller
                Its pretty simple Terry.

                No judge or jury in their right mind would deem Haymon as violating the Ali Act based on $$$ fighters are receiving compared to their peers with other managers and promoters.

                Are all boxing promoters this dumb?
                .



                It's hilarious how these racists want Haymon out the game because he's "violating the Ali act" which is in place to protect the fighters from being robbed. All of Haymon's fighters make the most money yet Haymon is violating the Ali act. How does that work again?

                Comment

                • snoopymiller
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 367
                  • 13
                  • 0
                  • 6,575

                  #278
                  Originally posted by lizard_man
                  .



                  It's hilarious how these racists want Haymon out the game because he's "violating the Ali act" which is in place to protect the fighters from being robbed. All of Haymon's fighters make the most money yet Haymon is violating the Ali act. How does that work again?
                  Its super strange and obviously ******ed.

                  I think GBP should hire Terry Trekass as an advisor... so they can piss away more legal fees and hope and pray HBO increases their budget. #boxingbusinessgenius

                  Comment

                  • OnePunch
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 9081
                    • 1,295
                    • 748
                    • 2,453,131

                    #279
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    Financial interest under what title? Not promoter. I mean, come on, man.

                    he is a licensed manager who has a financial interest in the promotional activities of his clients. The law states that is a no-no.

                    And its great that Haymon is playing Santa Claus, and being the "irrational player" who overpays everyone and puts smiley faces on their checks, but at some point he will have to transition to being more "rational"

                    Lets see if the love fest continues at that point......

                    Comment

                    • OnePunch
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 9081
                      • 1,295
                      • 748
                      • 2,453,131

                      #280
                      Originally posted by snoopymiller
                      Its super strange and obviously ******ed.

                      I think GBP should hire Terry Trekass as an advisor... so they can piss away more legal fees and hope and pray HBO increases their budget. #boxingbusinessgenius
                      im not sure that anyone who uses hashtags in a forum post ought to be calling anyone else "******ed"

                      just a thought........

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP