Comments Thread For: Judge Rules Against Golden Boy in Its Lawsuit Against Al Haymon

[snoopymiller]

none taken :-)

I know that you know that you are a loser.

Loses don't take offense... they know it's the truth.

[OnePunch]

I know that you know that you are a loser.

Loses don't take offense... they know it's the truth.

whatever. You are just some anonymous clown on the internet. You're BARELY worth my indifference........

[snoopymiller]

whatever. You are just some anonymous clown on the internet. You're BARELY worth my indifference........

Anonymous or not... I've clearly pointed out the flaws in your thought process and how outdated your mentality is.

That was the purpose.

Thanks for indulging!

[OnePunch]

Anonymous or not... I've clearly pointed out the flaws in your thought process and how outdated your mentality is.

That was the purpose.

Thanks for indulging!

must suck to be so ashamed of your own viewpoints that you are forced to hide in anonymity.

And all you've done is expressed your opinion. Nothing more. Nothing less. Just more hot air from someone who never has and never will actually DO SOMETHING in the sport

[snoopymiller]

must suck to be so ashamed of your own viewpoints that you are forced to hide in anonymity.

LOL... must suck to have your inferior brain and sub par thought process. That's a permanent thing ya know.

DO SOMETHING? Like gloat about putting on hundreds of money losing shows? Ahahahahaha haha

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Sad.

[OnePunch]

LOL... must suck to have your inferior brain and sub par thought process. That's a permanent thing ya know.

DO SOMETHING? Like gloat about putting on hundreds of money losing shows? Ahahahahaha haha

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Sad.

whats actually funny is that you dont even see the sad irony in your own posts.

[snoopymiller]

whats actually funny is that you dont even see the sad irony in your own posts.

You're a dinosaur.

[original zero]

I am surprised though that you actually acknowledge that the so-called "promoters" really dont have anything at all to do with generating the event revenue, and that it is Haymon that is making all the deals, and telling the promoter how much money he has to work with. And on top of it you acknowledge that Haymon will reimburse a promoter for any losses. So Haymon basically tells the promoter how much revenue is available, tells the promoter how much he is "allowed" to make, and eats any potential losses, but yet you claim with a straight face that Haymon does NOT have a financial interest in the event.

All of that is completely kosher as long as the only funds winding up in Haymon's pocket are the management fees. You have no proof and no evidence to suggest otherwise. You are accusing him of skimming off the top before paying fighters, which we both agree would be 100% illegal. But you're making the accusation for absolutely no reason and with nothing to back it up. You're completely delusional and continue to imagine these "crimes" that aren't actually taking place.

Its laughable, and I'm beginning to think that your brain doesnt function properly. And I had to save a screenshot of your post because its THAT funny.

You're the one working at the furniture store Terry. You're the one that lost money in the fight biz. I've made money consistently for 19 years in the fight biz. I assure you my brain is functioning fine. I am living in reality while you are living in some imaginary fairy tale where you claim Haymon is ripping off all of his fighters, even though you have zero proof and zero evidence.

Why won't you just admit it's a conspiracy theory you invented? We both know that's what it is. Are we going to get to 100 pages with you still refusing to post proof?

[original zero]

on and on and on with the friggin band analogies. Point to a law that regulates band managers the way the Ali Act regulates boxer managers and you might have a point.

But there isnt.

And you dont.

Wrong.

Manager has fiduciary duty regardless. Has nothing to do with the Ali act. Is illegal, with or without the Ali act, for a manager to skim money off the top the way you're suggesting Haymon is. And you're making that very serious accusation without anything to back it up.

[aboutfkntime]

all I know is.....

Judge ruled against Golden Boy in its lawsuit against Al Haymon

so PBC haters just took another L

we all know why PBC is unpopular, even if most won't admit it

if Haymon managed Pacquiao, PBC would be the best thing since sliced bread

but nope.....





if the argument against PBC was strictly boxing-related..... as-in, Haymon/PBC are bad for the sport because (insert reason here), then fine..... but it's not.....

any monopoly is normally a bad thing..... not sure if the UFC is the best model at all, and not convinced that Haymon will be any better..... but the problem is this.....

1) the current model is fatally flawed.....
* HBO/Arum are vultures, they have to go..... both have PROVEN that they would happily burn the sport to the ground if they could be king of the ashes
* exclusive network contracts are a major problem, further exacerbating the fragmentation caused by having multiple sanctioning bodies.....
* ANYTHING would be better than the current model, which is CLEARLY not heading in the right direction

2) to date, Haymon has been a HUGE success.....
* by all accounts, Haymon is much fairer with his fighters
* the increase in free-to-air boxing is GREAT for the sport

on the other hand, you got guys insisting that Haymon is the savior of boxing..... completely forgetting that Waddell & Reed are not the Salvation Army, nor are they boxing fans.....

exciting times imho

I'm sitting on the fence, to see how this shht plays out.

so far..... PBC > HBO/Arum, hands down

..... but if/when they ever have a monopoly, and Waddell & Reed shareholders start whining..... then we will find out what is more important to PBC, money or boxing.....

..... anyone think it will be boxing ?