Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: In The Eyes of The People - I Beat Floyd Mayweather

[travestyny]

Your expert never seen QUEST make a mistake as far as incorrectly call out a positive result.

Your expert said that there can be dramatically different results.

Which of the above 2 statements are wrong? I say none and I see you deflecting what I said!

YOU HAVE NO EXPERTS THAT AGREE WITH YOU! WHERE THEY AT? STOP DUCKING!

TALK ABOUT SLOW:
a) Your 2 experts are biased

LMAOOOOO. THAT'S WHAT YOU ALWAYS SAY WHEN YOU LOSE!!!!!!!!

Drrr, ALL 3 experts said that there can be dramatically different results. That is all you really need to know and get. Can you understand that? I doubt it! You will deflect ...... AGAIN!!!

WRONG. I DON'T KNOW WHAT 3 EXPERTS YOU ARE REFERRING TO. I SHOWED YOU 2 THAT SAID YOU ARE WRONG!!! WHERE ARE YOURS AT THAT SAY YOU ARE RIGHT? SHOW ME. STOP DUCKING BlTCH!

and lets not forget that you cannot get what 8 FOLDS or 10 FOLDS mean. So again, go learn all that and then come back and say THAY YOU WERE WRONG!!!


You couldn't even agree to something as simple as this:
SG and CR have their limitations. I showed you proof that SG can be above the limit yet the sample was still diluted as far as the PEDs in question. Go learn or at least admit that you were WRONG but didn't have the guts to admit it. I would accept that and shake your hand ......................

.

WHERE THE **** IS THERE ANY EXPERT THAT SAYS YOU ARE RIGHT. STOP DUCKING BIOTCH!!!! YOU DON'T HAVE ANY!

WE DON'T BELIEVE YOU...YOU NEED MORE PEOPLE!

[ADP02]

Oh man, more of the same nonsense. Read my previous post. You do the same when they do not jive with your agenda.



2 can play your dumb game:

NSAC stopped the investigation with Manny. Did you just accept NSAC or did you start up a thread and show how Manny was waving a flag on a still picture? Which I showed you that you were WRONG with that picture as it was taken BEFORE the fight not after. Lots of Floyd fans drank your Koolaid but they didn't know the truth.

Then you went on and on about a LEGAL substance and how it would put Manny at an advantage even though we both know that it wouldn't against a defensive fighter that doesn't throw like Mike Tyson and not even frequently. That was on a legal substance. Imagine it wasn't, like Floyd?

NSAC said you were WRONG about DIAZ......



.

1. You said mayweather was abusing clenbuterol.

AND YOU'VE BEEN WRONG ABOUT A MILLION OTHER THINGS TOO, CLOWN BOY!

What happened mr. Expert ant-doping guy? Shows you know nothing of what you are talking about.

meanwhile: I proved my case about pac and won the poll. You cried that...surprise surprise...the poll was biased. Lmaoooooooo! Just like you always do when you lose. Something or someone is biased. Lmaoooooooo! Clown!

2. You admit being proven wrong about 2 hours to dope.

then 2 experts prove you wrong...and you.....


Crickets chirping. Lmaoooooo

give the **** up.

still waiting for your experts that believe you. Showed you mine. Waitinggggggggggg!!!!! Where yours at, doe?

Embarrassing to actually prove that I was right .... You are deflecting, man!

I C/P one of 2 substance used by a cyclist and you make nonsensical comments .... until I brought up my point you had no clue about what I was even talking about.


2 Diaz's experts? Yup, thought you would deflect and talk dumb.

[The Problem Child]

That is fact, most people had Pacquiao winning the fight. I myself had Pacquiao edging it out by 3 points, even with an injured shoulder/arm. Imagine had this fight taken place 5 years ago when it was supposed to.

[travestyny]

embarrassing to actually prove that i was right .... You are deflecting, man!

I c/p one of 2 substance used by a cyclist and you make nonsensical comments .... Until i brought up my point you had no clue about what i was even talking about.


2 diaz's experts? Yup, thought you would deflect and talk dumb.

what???? You admit you were wrong about clenbuterol. Lmaoo


but but but...it's in iv bags. Lmaoooooooo!!!!!!!



Where are your experts, clown. Show them!

[ADP02]

Your expert never seen QUEST make a mistake as far as incorrectly call out a positive result.

Your expert said that there can be dramatically different results.

Which of the above 2 statements are wrong? I say none and I see you deflecting what I said!




TALK ABOUT SLOW:
a) Your 2 experts are biased and in favor of Diaz. One was Diaz's witness and the other helped Diaz by providing him with lawyers and both used unreliable values. Lets see you deflect the word UNRELIABLE VALUES ....... AGAIN!!!!

b) As I stated above but you like to deflect, Your expert said that there can be dramatically different results.


.


Drrr, ALL 3 experts said that there can be dramatically different results. That is all you really need to know and get. Can you understand that? I doubt it! You will deflect ...... AGAIN!!!


and lets not forget that you cannot get what 8 FOLDS or 10 FOLDS mean. So again, go learn all that and then come back and say THAY YOU WERE WRONG!!!


You couldn't even agree to something as simple as this:
SG and CR have their limitations. I showed you proof that SG can be above the limit yet the sample was still diluted as far as the PEDs in question. Go learn or at least admit that you were WRONG but didn't have the guts to admit it. I would accept that and shake your hand ......................

.

YOU HAVE NO EXPERTS THAT AGREE WITH YOU! WHERE THEY AT? STOP DUCKING!




LMAOOOOO. THAT'S WHAT YOU ALWAYS SAY WHEN YOU LOSE!!!!!!!!



WRONG. I DON'T KNOW WHAT 3 EXPERTS YOU ARE REFERRING TO. I SHOWED YOU 2 THAT SAID YOU ARE WRONG!!! WHERE ARE YOURS AT THAT SAY YOU ARE RIGHT? SHOW ME. STOP DUCKING BlTCH!



WHERE THE **** IS THERE ANY EXPERT THAT SAYS YOU ARE RIGHT. STOP DUCKING BIOTCH!!!! YOU DON'T HAVE ANY!

WE DON'T BELIEVE YOU...YOU NEED MORE PEOPLE!

Read my post. I told you that you would deflect. I'm right AGAIN!


3 experts who stated that results can be dramatically different:
- QUEST, SMRTL and yes, even Diaz's side ....

Now lets see you deflect again ... you gotta stay consistent!


QUEST: "It is next to impossible to tie together different specimens collected at different points in time, particularly collected over different dates."


SMRTL: "nearly impossible to directly correlate exactly but it is definitely consistent (greater THC when specific gravity is greater)"


DIAZ's expert: It requires that they follow certain protocols and standards to ensure that the outcome is similar in between different labs. They are regulating on which instruments they can use. The reagents on the instruments and the calibration on the instruments and techniques and many more ..... and without that,
Final results can vary dramatically as we can see here (Quest vs SMRTL Labs).



BOOM!!!!

[ADP02]

what???? You admit you were wrong about clenbuterol. Lmaoo


but but but...it's in iv bags. Lmaoooooooo!!!!!!!



Where are your experts, clown. Show them!

Too funny that you are still talking about this ... the cyclist had 2 PEDs that were positive. I C/P the wrong one into my post.

Both of which you had no idea about.

[travestyny]

Read my post. I told you that you would deflect. I'm right AGAIN!


3 experts who stated that results can be dramatically different:
- QUEST, SMRTL and yes, even Diaz's side ....

Now lets see you deflect again ... you gotta stay consistent!


QUEST: "It is next to impossible to tie together different specimens collected at different points in time, particularly collected over different dates."


SMRTL: "nearly impossible to directly correlate exactly but it is definitely consistent (greater THC when specific gravity is greater)"


DIAZ's expert: It requires that they follow certain protocols and standards to ensure that the outcome is similar in between different labs. They are regulating on which instruments they can use. The reagents on the instruments and the calibration on the instruments and techniques and many more ..... and without that,
Final results can vary dramatically as we can see here (Quest vs SMRTL Labs).



BOOM!!!!

Where are your experts at that believe you. I’m waiting!!! Let’s make a poll and post up our experts who know shlt about drug testing, and let BoxingScene decide. Deal? I bet you’ll bltch outttt! hahahahahaha. Step up, boy!

Dr. Hani Khella: A certified medical review officer for 20 years.

[IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202017-01-19%20at%207.43.05%20AM.png[/IMG]

A Medical Review Officer (MRO) is a person who is a licensed physician and who is responsible for receiving and reviewing laboratory results generated by an employer's drug testing program and evaluating medical explanations for certain drug test results.

MRO’s act as an independent and impartial "gatekeeper" and advocate for the accuracy and integrity of the drug testing process.

Diaz’s medical expert, Dr. Hani Khella, testified that the variations in the test results were “not medically plausible.” Dr. Khella stated that the difference between concentrations in the two post-fight tests could not be attributed to simple rehydration and that Diaz would have had to endanger his life by drinking “30 glasses of water” in such a short timeframe. The doctor testified that the increase between Diaz’s first and third tests was “typical movement that you would expect to see in a more concentrated sample or more dehydrated sample.”

Jeff Novitzky: Anti-Doping Expert



Jeffrey John Novitzky is an agent for the Food and Drug Administration investigating the use of steroids in professional sports. Before April 2008 he was a special agent for the Internal Revenue Service who investigated the use of steroids for over five years.

Novitzky first gained renown in 2003 while working as an IRS agent in the Bay Area, where he uncovered the BALCO doping conspiracy. After sifting through garbage for clues as to how Victor Conte's nutritional supplement company was dispensing steroids to athletes, Novitzky led a raid that led to prosecutions of Marion Jones, Barry Bonds and others.
Later Novitzky moved to the FDA, where he helped drive the government probes that brought down Roger Clemens and Lance Armstrong. Novitzky testified at the perjury trials of both Bonds and Clemens. He was said by several acquaintances to be deeply frustrated by the 2012 decision by the U.S. Attorney's office in Los Angeles to not seek criminal charges against Armstrong, who was later banned from sports for leading a sophisticated doping conspiracy.

"They got this one wrong, in my opinion. The Quest Labs sample was 733 ng/ml, one of the highest I’ve ever seen.

There are big issues in interpreting those results.

There’s no real scientific medical explanation for someone having a 40, then right after the fight a 733, and shortly after that back to 60."

Two experts say you're wrong. Bring out your experts, boy! I'll be waiting!

[travestyny]

Too funny that you are still talking about this ... the cyclist had 2 PEDs that were positive. I C/P the wrong one into my post.

Both of which you had no idea about.

No. You just got it wrong, clown. LMAOOOOOOOOO!!!!

[Larry the boss]

why are people still arguing over this ****?? its over Manny ****ing lost..move on!!!

[pasawayako]

That is fact, most people had Pacquiao winning the fight. I myself had Pacquiao edging it out by 3 points, even with an injured shoulder/arm. Imagine had this fight taken place 5 years ago when it was supposed to.

If it was 5 years ago floyd will be very very lucky to see the round 12.