If GGG destroys Jacobs he deserves respect
Collapse
-
Stop being dumb. Jacobs is good. GGG is favored because he's better. That's how it works.Comment
-
-
Are you saying that Danny is B level? Danny is not B level, dude.
And I'm not just saying that to make Danny look good if Golovkin wins...because I like Danny every bit as much as I like Golovkin. Hell I don't even know who I'm rooting for.
Danny Jacobs is an A level guy. Danny's one single well timed, big shot (that he took) away from being 33-0. With a current 88% KO percentage to boot. The dude destructed an outstanding, elite fighter (Quillin) in 1 frigging round.
Danny's absolutely a legitimate A level guy.Comment
-
It kinda always worked that way right? when was the last time a Golovkin opponent was not a 85-95% underdog?
bwahahahaha! your trolling Peter Quillin is elite?! hahahahaha! I come here everyday for laughs and you guys never fail me.Are you saying that Danny is B level? Danny is not B level, dude.
And I'm not just saying that to make Danny look good if Golovkin wins...because I like Danny every bit as much as I like Golovkin. Hell I don't even know who I'm rooting for.
Danny Jacobs is an A level guy. Danny's one single well timed, big shot (that he took) away from being 33-0. With a current 88% KO percentage to boot. The dude destructed an outstanding, elite fighter (Quillin) in 1 frigging round.
Danny's absolutely a legitimate A level guy.Comment
-
This is a master Larry troll thread. Basically GGG has to wipe out a top contender to get respect. Can't just 8-4 him.Comment
-
Dude held the WBO middleweight title for 3 years. Yeah I think he's pretty damn good. Prior to his loss to Jacobs I think Quillin was one of the top 25 fighters in the world, pound for pound, and I don't think it's possible to reach those heights in boxing without being elite.
Let me ask you something, 1hour. Who do you consider elite? Do you realize what it takes to reach a point in this sport where you're headlining main events that are aired by major networks? Do you understand how laughably small the percentage is of aspiring fighters who are able to make it that far in the sport? It's astronomically low.
Yes, to me, Quillin is a top shelf talent. And so is Danny Jacobs.Comment
-
Comment
-
You must hold Billy Joe Saunder in high regard then...now to answer your question -- I feel elite does not apply to every-weight class nor a high ranking; elite to me has P4P relevance being able to effectively compete in higher weights as the greats of yesterday have done in reaching higher levels which ordinary men are unable to realize -- there maybe an exception to the rule but its very rare in which resume supersedes this criteria as in the case of Andre Ward when he became one division lineal champion @ 168 with impressive victories over future HOF champions : Kessler, Abraham, Froch. I consider Quillin a decent fighter the same applies for highly ranked contenders throughout the diverse weight divisions...today the Hype is ridiculous with social media and forums that make average 'champions' and even contenders appear to be great in managing to stay unbeaten or collecting meaningless titles.Dude held the WBO middleweight title for 3 years. Yeah I think he's pretty damn good. Prior to his loss to Jacobs I think Quillin was one of the top 25 fighters in the world, pound for pound, and I don't think it's possible to reach those heights in boxing without being elite.
Let me ask you something, 1hour. Who do you consider elite? Do you realize what it takes to reach a point in this sport where you're headlining main events that are aired by major networks? Do you understand how laughably small the percentage is of aspiring fighters who are able to make it that far in the sport? It's astronomically low.
Yes, to me, Quillin is a top shelf talent. And so is Danny Jacobs.Comment
Maxi is scared shitless about thus fight for some inexplicable reason.
Comment