Why are brits so naive??

[SteveM]

Because admitting defeat is hard for some, its bias.
Badou Jack controlled this fight it was easy to score for me the knockdown in the 12th put the fight completely far away from DeGale.

Face of a winner

nah - he just marks up badly

[NaijaD]

1. 10-8 - degale
2 .10 -9 degale
rounds 3 to 9 jack
10- degale
11- jack
12. 10 -8 jack

kys

I humbly disagree with Jack sweeping rounds 3 to 9.

[JamMG]

Im a brit and though degale was landing 3s and 4s on the gloves jack was landing body shots inbetween etc

[M Bison]

nah - he just marks up badly

He bruises easily because he is eating clean shots to the face all the time, overrated fighter.
Jack exposed DeGale yet some people just want to try to be different lol.

DeGale has been awful two times before this fight and he was shiet once more out of his last 3 fights he could have lost all 3 but luckily he has corruption behind him.

[LaterRoundz]

I had it scored a draw. 6 rounds each. DeGale took the first 3 and then 9/10/11.

Jack caused much more damage though and won his rounds more convincingly but they're still 10-9 rounds. Some people just remember the aggression and damaged caused and forget it's scored round by round. If we scored from emotion and getting our judgement skewed because a guy is getting beaten up then we could say Maidana won the first Mayweather fight, but he didn't because Floyd managed to just win enough rounds but Floyd took all the punishment in that fight.

That's basically how i see this one. DeGale did win 6 rounds but if there HAD to be a winner, i'd say Jack would deserve it.

I'm absolutely agreed with you. The sense is that Jack won clearly if you're watching from an emotional point of view.. perhaps how a casual observer might judge a street fight. I actually had the third round shared and gave the fight to Jack overall, but the point is this was a close fight according to the scoring system used in boxing. I don't think the result can be slated as being a robbery.

[SteveM]

He bruises easily because he is eating clean shots to the face all the time, overrated fighter.
Jack exposed DeGale yet some people just want to try to be different lol.

DeGale has been awful two times before this fight and he was shiet once more out of his last 3 fights he could have lost all 3 but luckily he has corruption behind him.

I was joking although there is some truth that some boxers bruise and cut easier than others.

What corruption? Surely fighting on the road 4 times in a row is not the best way to secure advantages?

[deathofaclown]

I'm absolutely agreed with you. The sense is that Jack won clearly if you're watching from an emotional point of view.. perhaps how a casual observer might judge a street fight. I actually had the third round shared and gave the fight to Jack overall, but the point is this was a close fight according to the scoring system used in boxing. I don't think the result can be slated as being a robbery.

Yeah. Well i did see DeGale winning 6 rounds but his were closer. That said, if Jack had got the decision i'd be fine with that. If DeGale did, then i'd say he had been fortunate. DeGale definitely didn't win the fight, but i just think he put the first few rounds in the bank and nicked 3 later on and that's how the mathematics of it works out on the points system that they have in place. The scoring might be correct but doesn't give a true reflection of the fight.

[M Bison]

I was joking although there is some truth that some boxers bruise and cut easier than others.

What corruption? Surely fighting on the road 4 times in a row is not the best way to secure advantages?

Going travelling is good and all but scoring the fights fairly is important too its not like Medina, Bute and Jack didn't travel as well.
How they could score Jack Vs Bute a draw but give DeGale a win over Bute is beyond me there is favours at hand for DeGale.

[REMOVE SHARK 55]

You bum I destroyed you so badly last night you went off and made a thread.

[Squ□redCircle34]

Judges aren't compubox you moron, they don't count punches, they didn't score anything 10-2.

Issac Clarke ehh? Your definitely not engineered for intelligence!

I look at the 2 people who count punches thrown and landed on the computers like the judges...both aren't efficient and tend to do **** jobs!

Need to get their eyes check or an eye exam test done before every fight!

New blood is needed, young with a passion for the sport and to deliver it justly and swiftly and not be marooned by the money or agendas!

Actually according to compubox they gave Pacquiao in one of the rounds only 2 landed punches while Floyd had 10+ in which that very round Floyd barely threw even 8 punches much less landed clean 4 blows while Pacquiao scored 4 landed blows!

We all can agree that Floyd is right about these judges/compubox screwing up the sport!