Jacobs has a real chance. Any unbiased person can admit that. Full credit to either man for the win here. No "Jacobs was a bum who already got knocked out" or "Golovkin was a hype job that got exposed." Full credit to either man.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
My unbiased prediction on GGG-Jacobs.
Collapse
-
Originally posted by _Maxi View PostThe evidence that you fail to show.
If I am a fanboy then so are Kenny Porter and Sergio Martinez.
You question his resume. You don't question the fighters avoiding him for years. You defend them. How convenient.
I am a Golovkin fan. But I'm not biased as you say, yet again, with no evidence.
I may not agree with his p4p ranking. I think his resume isn't great and have criticized him for it and made fun of the easy opponents. Other than that show me where I said anything negative about him as a person or his boxing skill.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by -PBP- View PostThis is exactly what he's doing. When GGG knocks him out within 6 rounds he is going to be like "oh man, GGG is such a wonderful fighter. I never thought he would've knocked out the iron chinned, bigger and stronger Jacobs within 12 rounds. I really thought Jacobs would drop him and send him to deep waters."
We see right through you _Maxi
Comment
-
Originally posted by _Maxi View PostNo. Actually what you guys are doing is to downplay Jacobs chances, so if he makes a competitive fight or beats GGG, you will say GGG was a bum all along.
I'm being unbiased. It's the #1 MW against the #2 MW. I expect a close fight. If you don't expect a close fight, then I guess you are more of a GGG tard than me.
See you're mad because my criticisms are fair and well reasoned, despite the fact that I am open about not liking him. I praise his skills and his talents. I crap on his resume. And yes, even though it pisses guys like you off, the truth is he won 2 titles in the boardroom.
Now I know you'd rather I not point that out, but don't act like I am Lying.
You are fucking paranoid dude. Just admit it, you hate me because I came up with Gullible Gennady Groupies.
Comment
-
The fact that this guy had to put "unbiased" in the thread title says it all, he just could have said, "my honest prediction" which would have been the same thing anyway
Consequences!
Comment
-
Originally posted by _Maxi View PostNo, you aren't. And I gave you credit for creating this thread, which helped to calm down the assh0les that were preassuring for GGG to move up.
Dunn belongs more in the group of CaneloMaidana, Kigali, boobies man, Isaac Clarke, etc. Haters. He's borderline though.
But you and dunn aren't the same, he's more of a hater. There's not much people laughing at the fact that Golovkin IS the #1 MW. It takes some special kind of hate to say he isn't. Am I saying he's invincible? no. Jacobs can take that spot. Canelo could take that spot soon, who knows.
Do you consider Kenny porter a ggg tard? do you consider Sergio Martinez a ggg tard? Roach a ggg tard? Steve Willis a ggg tard? the list goes on...
The anti-soviet spirit still lives in the heart of some people.
What's wrong with this thread http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=726616 ?? I'm stating the truth. Discuss with arguments if you don't agree.
Just look at your ****ing signature FFS.So I'm not allowed to crack a joke here and there? Kenny Porter and Sergio Martinez aren't "GGG tard's", IMO. I do believe you are but there's nothing wrong with that. You are my favorite GGG tard on NSB.
The problem with you is that you think that GGG should not be subject to criticism and any criticism that he receives makes somebody "Anti-soviet".
No fighter is above receiving fair criticism, especially when you are one of the best in the world. Your standards go up.
Comment
-
Looool sorry Maxi but outside of the Golovkin ultras: Freedom, Bigdramashow, Jubei, Golovkin and ******ed cyclone..... no one is going to trip over and accidentally mistake you for being unbiased when it comes to anything Golovkin. Plus anyone who is truly unbiased does not need to label themselves as such, other posters will decide if you are.
Where you failed by me was when you failed to criticise the Brook fight, you instantly lauded it as a great matchup when an unbiased fan would have labelled it as the circus sideshow it really was. You are incapable of accepting any criticism of GGG, let alone criticising the man yourself. YOU ARE EXTREMELY BIASED.
Comment
Comment