Originally posted by g27region
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Daniel Jacobs hires Soviet sparring partners to prepare for GGG
Collapse
-
The same people that constantly berate Jacobs for getting stopped by Pirog.. brush off Manny's early KO losses.
Pirog will not be in that ring with GGG.
People act like this is a tag-team match.
Golovkin/Pirog vs Daniel Jacobs.
Jacobs doesn't have a tumor growing on his spine and he's not 23 y/o this time around people.
Golovkin better be working overtime on his defense,because what he's shown so far, ain't gonna' cut it.
GGG better hire Pernell Whittaker and several relatives of Willie Pep and do it in a hurry.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostYou haven't even seen the readily available, 5 round fight, you read about it on a boxing forum lol. Gtfo lame troll
Why you even argue with me if everything I've said was right?
I've said that Pirog achieved nothing remarkable in pros, so we never had the chance to know the real value of his potential, that is true
I've said that Jacobs was winning that fight, yes and that is also true, he was leading 39-37 on all three scorecards before that KO
Tell me, which one of these things is false?
Originally posted by Kigali View PostThe same people that constantly berate Jacobs for getting stopped by Pirog.. brush off Manny's early KO losses.
Pirog will not be in that ring with GGG.
People act like this is a tag-team match.
Golovkin/Pirog vs Daniel Jacobs.
Jacobs doesn't have a tumor growing on his spine and he's not 23 y/o this time around people.
Golovkin better be working overtime on his defense,because what he's shown so far, ain't gonna' cut it.
GGG better hire Pernell Whittaker and several relatives of Willie Pep and do it in a hurry.
Calm down, because the same people who says that Pirog KO doesn't mean anything since "it was a long time ago and he improved", they berate Lomachenko for losing a fight with Salido, ignoring the same arguments
You might say that Lomachenko is a bum for losing to Salido, but then you have to call Danny Jacobs "Pirog's son"
Or you might defend Jacobs for losing to Pirog because he's "improved from that moment", but then you have to admit that Lomachenko loss doesn't mean nothing because he's improved as well
All other options would be double standartsLast edited by g27region; 01-08-2017, 04:28 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dr Rumack View Post
The ultimate shitpost from a know-nothing casual.
I try to follow the fights that I consider relevant and interesting for me, that's it
And I'm still right, Danny Jacobs was winning this fight on scorecardsLast edited by g27region; 01-08-2017, 07:09 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by StudentOfDaGame View PostJacobs isn't 8/1 in the bookmakers . GGG is 1/8 on, there's a massive difference. All this propaganda and saying the right things is going to make me put some money on Jacobs.i think also lemule was the hardest puncher ggg has faced so thats why they boxed more
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr Rumack View PostI watched that fight back today too. Pirog was superb. Such a shame he got injured.
He really didn't right like the stereotypical Soviet school fighter at all though. Great head and upper body movement like you said, bent his legs and didn't stay tall, leaned at the waist, used a lot of hooks, feinted constantly, was very fluid, and fought at a high tempo.
Golovkin doesn't fight exactly like Pirog but he is just as unconventional as him, if you're taking the stereotype of the Eastern robot as your model. He also fights at a high tempo, stays low a lot of the time, and looks to score big with hooks in a way that the stereotype Soviet school fighter doesn't.
Golovkin might be a good bit more hittable than Pirog, but if the Lemieux fight is anything to go by he's nowhere near as reckless if he respects the opponent's power.
The bigger question is what has Jacob's learned about how to deal with pressure. He did ok at times against Pirog but he always looked very uncomfortable with the rabbit role. Got caught square on several occasions. He landed some nice shots but in general it was single shots. Rarely did he score a significant combination. That probably wouldn't be enough to beat Golovkin.
Comment
Comment