when u r the challenger, imo, u r supposed to take the belt from the champion. If anything Collazo was more accurate and landed the cleaner shots. This reminds me of Hopkins/Taylor. IMO Taylor still hasnt done enough to take Hopkins belt from him.
I think a draw would of been ok thanks to that 10/8 round for hatton. Imagine Hatton vs Castillo that would be an ugly fight because of their styles their both hell of rough.
you can't have a draw with a knockdown in a 12 round fight. two knockdowns or a point deduction can mean a draw. learn how to score fights, jackass.
wow u people r really ignorant. okay heres this for an example. i wanted taylor to beat hopkins but to me he didnt do enough to take the belts away from him. same case for hatton except i really didnt care who won this fight. b4 u hatton huggers get offended think about this. if u get mad because of someone's OPINION, u need to let go of the sack a little.
wow u people r really ignorant. okay heres this for an example. i wanted taylor to beat hopkins but to me he didnt do enough to take the belts away from him. same case for hatton except i really didnt care who won this fight. b4 u hatton huggers get offended think about this. if u get mad because of someone's OPINION, u need to let go of the sack a little.
nobody is offended its just that your about the twelth hater to make the same thread.
damn keyboard warriors. u r just one of the ignorants...
you do know they score fights by rounds, right? otherwise, why not only fight when you have the energy to go for the knockout? it's not who's more beat up or who did enough to take the belt. Hell, Hopkins beat Taylor up more but he sure as hell didn't win more rounds. You need to look into another sport because this one is scored by the round not by the beating.
when u r the challenger, imo, u r supposed to take the belt from the champion. If anything Collazo was more accurate and landed the cleaner shots. This reminds me of Hopkins/Taylor. IMO Taylor still hasnt done enough to take Hopkins belt from him.
I agree with your assesment ont he Hatton fight. IMO he should not have gotten the decision although I suppose it is debateable. One thing is for sure though, the decision should not have been that lopsided in Hatton favor. If I remember correctly he was ahead by 3 points on all three cards.
damn keyboard warriors. u r just one of the ignorants...
I'm a "keyboard warrior" because I'm smarter than you and know how to score boxing while you just think the winner is whoever does the most damage? Well, I'm fine with that to be honest. You're the ****** one after all
I agree with your assesment ont he Hatton fight. IMO he should not have gotten the decision although I suppose it is debateable. One thing is for sure though, the decision should not have been that lopsided in Hatton favor. If I remember correctly he was ahead by 3 points on all three cards.
3 points on two cards and 1 point on another. How else can you score it for Hatton? 115-112 means 7 rounds to 5 plus a knockdown. 114-113 is the closest score possible in a winning performance.
Comment