Originally posted by Boxfan83
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
So is a division considered "weak" when there is 1 dominant champ?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View PostNo.. If one guy is better than the rest by quite a margin then its not a knock on the other guys..
Once in a while you get an opponent who can challenge you & are equally as good as you are.. like Lennox had in Holyfield, the rest though good did not have the same skills as him.. Lomachenko made Gary Russell Jr look like an amateur but Russell is a very good boxer.. Klitschko dominated very good boxers like Haye, Ibragimov, Povetkin..
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Boxfan83 View PostI agree. Even with dominate guys there will always be someone to give them a challenge but if its every fight and the champ is winning controversially that weak IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingHippo View PostI reckon this is about the middleweight division. Which ones of these fighters do you think is worth a damn:
Daniel Jacobs
Billy Joe Saunders
David Lemieux
Andy Lee
Peter Quillin
Chris Eubank Jr
Ryota Murata
Curtis Stevens
Hassan N’Dam
Ievgen Khytrov
Sam Soliman
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View PostWhat division has one dominant champ? I don't follow those lower weights so I'm not sure what division you're talking about
Comment
-
all 17 divisions have great fighters. but usually a division is considered strong when it has STARS and considered weak when it doesn't.
if right now GGG was WBA middleweight champion, cotto was WBC middleweight champion, canelo was WBO middleweight champion and some random dude was IBF champion, and there were plans for a series of unification fights, everybody would be talking about how middleweight is the most stacked division in boxing.
but the truth is that cotto's team & canelo's team both thought their guys stood no chance against GGG, so they fought each other for the imaginary 155 pound championship and then got the hell out of dodge.
Comment
Comment