So is a division considered "weak" when there is 1 dominant champ?
Collapse
-
-
all 17 divisions have great fighters. but usually a division is considered strong when it has STARS and considered weak when it doesn't.
if right now GGG was WBA middleweight champion, cotto was WBC middleweight champion, canelo was WBO middleweight champion and some random dude was IBF champion, and there were plans for a series of unification fights, everybody would be talking about how middleweight is the most stacked division in boxing.
but the truth is that cotto's team & canelo's team both thought their guys stood no chance against GGG, so they fought each other for the imaginary 155 pound championship and then got the hell out of dodge.Comment
-
You are right about the heavyweight division. Yes, it's top heavy with a solid top 7 (8 when Tyson Fury comes back, and minus PEDvetkin who's soon to be suspended). Then there's like 40-50 guys (including prospects) after that would make for competitive fights with each other but not really with most of the top 8. I wouldn't call that weak. I don't think I can make a serious top 5 at Middleweight even with Canelo.Comment
-
but outside of hardcore boxing nerds, who the hell is talking about the cruiserweight division? how many of those top 20-30 with competitive fights are being shown by HBO or PBC? out of sight, out of mind.Comment
-
Floyd was the dominant champion at 147lbs, yet no one ever even thought of trying to say that welterweight was a weak division.
A division only becomes "weak", when the talent level in the division isn't very good.
BoxRec isn't the end all, be all, but, of their top 100 fighters, p4p, 5 of them are middleweights. Compared to 11 fighters at 147lbs.Comment
-
Nobody gives a **** about Cruiserweights but that helps my point that the number of stars doesn't mean much as there are none in that division but nobody is calling it weak.Comment
-
A division is "weak" if it fits someone's argument on here.
There is no real barometer.
What makes a strong division is lots of even competition and elite competition at that or close to it.
I have been around boxing for a while though and thus rely heavily on my knowledge and recognition of the sport over resumes or marketability of fighters, wheras casuals tend to judge only by marketability first, resume second, and have no ability to use the eye test. That's why to a casual, a division with no names is a weak division. To me, a division can be full of "names" and be weak.
Right now, I consider the ww division weak, and the hw division strong, for example.
I think the most stack division with talent is lhw and I don't get how these guys rate what's a good or weak but I know this thread the op probably talking about how everyone always call the mw a weak division.
I think it's an ok division it probably be a lot more competitive if ggg wasn't in that division and Jacobs would probably getting a lot more hype than he's getting now. I would probably favor Monroe over both charlo and the people on this forums love to hype the jmw division.Comment
-
Well Klitchko was dominate for YEARS and it was considered weak until he lost then all of a sudden its alive and thriving. Hell we just saw Andy Ruiz fight for title and get robbed lol But regardless, how can a dominate champ get props if hes dominating the top ten? think of it this way, one of the "weak" top 10 guys woulda been champ if there wasnt a dominate champ...Last edited by JAB5239; 12-30-2016, 01:32 AM.Comment
Comment