Originally posted by Boxfan83
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
So is a division considered "weak" when there is 1 dominant champ?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by original zero View Postall 17 divisions have great fighters. but usually a division is considered strong when it has STARS and considered weak when it doesn't.
if right now GGG was WBA middleweight champion, cotto was WBC middleweight champion, canelo was WBO middleweight champion and some random dude was IBF champion, and there were plans for a series of unification fights, everybody would be talking about how middleweight is the most stacked division in boxing.
but the truth is that cotto's team & canelo's team both thought their guys stood no chance against GGG, so they fought each other for the imaginary 155 pound championship and then got the hell out of dodge.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View PostI think 140 is weak. Burns and that other guy from Africa are the other champs. And the guy that African guy beat wasn't that good. I'd pick a color 135 lb to beat both. I think heavyweight is top heavy. After the top 6 guys the rest are interchangeable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blackclouds View PostThis doesn't explain the cruiserweight division that has no stars but has a solid top 20-30 with competitive fights up and down the ledger. One of the stronger divisions out there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxfan83 View PostThats the feeling I am getting. Thoughts?..
A division only becomes "weak", when the talent level in the division isn't very good.
BoxRec isn't the end all, be all, but, of their top 100 fighters, p4p, 5 of them are middleweights. Compared to 11 fighters at 147lbs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by original zero View Postbut outside of hardcore boxing nerds, who the hell is talking about the cruiserweight division? how many of those top 20-30 with competitive fights are being shown by HBO or PBC? out of sight, out of mind.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LoadedWraps View PostA division is "weak" if it fits someone's argument on here.
There is no real barometer.
What makes a strong division is lots of even competition and elite competition at that or close to it.
I have been around boxing for a while though and thus rely heavily on my knowledge and recognition of the sport over resumes or marketability of fighters, wheras casuals tend to judge only by marketability first, resume second, and have no ability to use the eye test. That's why to a casual, a division with no names is a weak division. To me, a division can be full of "names" and be weak.
Right now, I consider the ww division weak, and the hw division strong, for example.
I think the most stack division with talent is lhw and I don't get how these guys rate what's a good or weak but I know this thread the op probably talking about how everyone always call the mw a weak division.
I think it's an ok division it probably be a lot more competitive if ggg wasn't in that division and Jacobs would probably getting a lot more hype than he's getting now. I would probably favor Monroe over both charlo and the people on this forums love to hype the jmw division.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxfan83 View PostWell Klitchko was dominate for YEARS and it was considered weak until he lost then all of a sudden its alive and thriving. Hell we just saw Andy Ruiz fight for title and get robbed lol But regardless, how can a dominate champ get props if hes dominating the top ten? think of it this way, one of the "weak" top 10 guys woulda been champ if there wasnt a dominate champ...Last edited by JAB5239; 12-30-2016, 01:32 AM.
Comment
Comment