Haha you are wrong about everything you are saying. You probably can't admit either when your wrong, to much nuissance of your fellow peers - Which is why you don't have any true friends. You are a knob.
Haha you are wrong about everything you are saying. You probably can't admit either when your wrong, to much nuissance of your fellow peers - Which is why you don't have any true friends. You are a knob.
its not that they scored round 10 the same. its that it was an easy kovalev round that they gave to ward. the reason they gave it to ward is because it was late in the fight and they knew how many rounds they already gave to kovalev, and they also knew giving kov one more would give him the fight so they gave it to ward because they wanted him to win.
round 10 was prob one kov's best rounds yet they all gave it to ward. if round 10 was in the first half of the fight they all give it to kovalev without a doubt but because they knew ward was close to a win if they gave him all the remaining rounds even though he clearly lost 10. they let their bias guide their scorecard. thats garbage.
Thats not even true. Burt Clements scored the last round for Kovalev. Round 10 was for Kovalev I agree, but I can see why it was scored for Ward, he sold them the appearance of control, he did land some clean shots in the round, and Kovalev's nose and face looked a bit busted up at the end of the round when he went back to his corner.
That probably swayed them - although I agree Kovalev won. But as someone already mentioned the fight was close, not a robbery so it doesn't really belong in this thread.
Comment