What was the worst robbery of 2016?

[The Big Dunn]

its not that they scored round 10 the same. its that it was an easy kovalev round that they gave to ward. the reason they gave it to ward is because it was late in the fight and they knew how many rounds they already gave to kovalev, and they also knew giving kov one more would give him the fight so they gave it to ward because they wanted him to win.

round 10 was prob one kov's best rounds yet they all gave it to ward. if round 10 was in the first half of the fight they all give it to kovalev without a doubt but because they knew ward was close to a win if they gave him all the remaining rounds even though he clearly lost 10. they let their bias guide their scorecard. thats garbage.

I agree with you that the 10th was a Kov round. Ward won the other rounds he got and even you do not dispute this. All the cards were not exactly the same. Kov got the 12th on one card, so your theory doesn't really hold.

I don't think there was another round that Ward got he didn't deserve. I can understand being upset that he got 1 round he didn't deserve (IMPO) and that changed the outcome of the fight.

[jmrf4435]

"I agree with you that the 10th was a Kov round. Ward won the other rounds he got and even you do not dispute this. All the cards were not exactly the same. Kov got the 12th on one card, so your theory doesn't really hold.

I don't think there was another round that Ward got he didn't deserve. I can understand being upset that he got 1 round he didn't deserve (IMPO) and that changed the outcome of the fight. "

People like you defending the score card keep bringing it up to "one round" . Kovalev basically swept 1-5 and the rest of the fight the round were basically split. That would be an easy kovalev voctory, which is hw the fight should have been scored.

Pro ward fighters, "how did you score round 8" dude, some of the later rounds were so close I could have them all for kovalev.

[SN!PER]

Maurice Hooker lives up to his name pretty well.

Seduces customers to pay for 30 minutes of action that isn't worth the money.

[mlac]

Maurice Hooker lives up to his name pretty well.

Seduces customers to pay for 30 minutes of action that isn't worth the money.

and then his pimp pay's to get him outta trouble

[Sp0rty Cr@ig]

Anyone who votes Ward-Kovalev clearly did not watch the whole card.

[The Hammer]

Anyone who votes Ward-Kovalev clearly did not watch the whole card.

Both fights were robberies.

Kovalev-Ward was the higher-profile fight.

The poll is multiple choice. I voted for both.

[BrometheusBob.]

Anyone who votes Ward-Kovalev clearly did not watch the whole card.

Most of them are salty Kova bros who are taking advantage of the multiple choice nature of the poll to avoid having to admit that Ward-Kovalev was not the robbery of the year.

I'm sure most of them would have voted for Hooker-Perez if they could only vote for one.

I watched Sturm-Chudinov as well and that was also a robbery, unlike Ward-Kovalev.

[SN!PER]

But robbery of the year is clearly Strum getting the decision over Chudinov. Thats the worst ****ing scoring I've seen in a fight, from all three judges, in a very long time. That **** was down right criminal imo.

"Chudinov was far more active and more accurate: Chudinov landed 297 accurate punches (from 1022 thrown), Sturm landed just 184 accurate punches (from 605 thrown)"

WTF?

Holy ****...

[ADP02]

i'd say the worst ever is son of gift vs kova.

at least 97% that watched the fight saw kova winning the fight.

SOG "Son of Gift" I have to admit that is funny.

[ADP02]

I haven't seen all those fights but Hooker vs Perez was certainly one of the worst ..... robbery.