Tweet
Originally posted by BrometheusBob.
View Post
-
Yea I'd definitely be down for that. -
-
$5 or $10 is very reasonable. I'd be interested.Originally posted by BrometheusBob. View PostComment
-
-
-
I'm all for it.Comment
-
-
-
Sounds like you already have a lot of interest so I'm guessing this will be a go. I just wanted to ask how it'll work. If it's a pot for 1 winner, I'd probably be out as things like that just create tensions and I feel like this place is hostile enough as is (people have been bickering and there's 0 money involved right nowOriginally posted by BrometheusBob. View Post
). If there's a break-down for the top 5 or so, I could see it being good natured since there will be several winners and the pot won't be all that big, so people won't get too worked up about it.
I know that probably won't be a popular stance but just thought I'd share my thoughts.Comment
-
Well for me it depends how many people ultimately join. If 10 people joined, pretty likely we'd just pay the winner. If 100 people joined, we could pay several people decent amounts.Originally posted by Redd Foxx View PostSounds like you already have a lot of interest so I'm guessing this will be a go. I just wanted to ask how it'll work. If it's a pot for 1 winner, I'd probably be out as things like that just create tensions and I feel like this place is hostile enough as is (people have been bickering and there's 0 money involved right now). If there's a break-down for the top 5 or so, I could see it being good natured since there will be several winners and the pot won't be all that big, so people won't get too worked up about it.
I know that probably won't be a popular stance but just thought I'd share my thoughts.
Also, I think it would be key to have more transparency in the scoring when money is involved. Somewhere where everyone could quickly see that their score (and other people's score/multipliers) is being updated correctly. I will work on that for the league next year.Comment
Comment