Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How many boxers were at their primes after turning 35?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
    The questions is simple.

    All I can think of is Mayweather. Sergio Martinez maybe? but probably was not prime anymore after turning 37. He was 35 when he beat Pavlik and Williams.

    Many ATG had more losses than victories after turning 34/35.

    Which means that if Golovkin is beaten in the next years a few times doesn't mean he wasn't an ATG. Just means he was old. Look at every ATG's resume and show me how many were still beating everyone after turning 35.
    Is Golovkin an ATG now? No, so yes it does mean he wasn't an ATG.

    Golovkin hasn't fought A level fighters which means we don't know how good he actually is, if he retires without ever beating an a-level fighter he's not an ATG. Sorry
    Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 12-17-2016, 07:04 AM.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
      Is Golovkin an ATG now? No, so yes it does mean he wasn't an ATG.


      top 3 MW all time currently.




      dominance. no losses. people dismiss his wins all the time. but the facts are he's beating nothing but top 10 MW's and champs for years.


      sure he's got 1 wW in there. who doesn't? monzon. hagler etc.
      Last edited by HeadShots; 12-17-2016, 07:10 AM.

      Comment


      • #43
        ****ing shameful thread. Trying to preemptively make excuses in case GGG loses.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
          Is Golovkin an ATG now? No, so yes it does mean he wasn't an ATG.

          Golovkin hasn't fought A level fighters which means we don't know how good he actually is, if he retires without ever beating an a-level fighter he's not an ATG. Sorry
          That's your POV and I can agree with that. I see a little beyond resume. There's a reason he had trouble getting elite fighters in the ring with him and that reason is not his fault, but we have different opinions on that matter so it's ok.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
            Not my fault you're new to the sport.
            Floyd used PEDs so I don't care about it. Using PEDs you can succeed at an old age.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by A.K View Post
              easy

              Rehydration is the cornerstone of treatment for cholera. Oral rehydration salts and, when necessary, intravenous fluids and electrolytes, if administered in a timely manner and in adequate volumes, will reduce fatalities to well under 1% of all patients.
              When you only cut 3 pounds you don't need IV's to rehydrate.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
                When you only cut 3 pounds you don't need IV's to rehydrate.
                thats easy to say for someone who doesn't spar every other day

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
                  Floyd used PEDs so I don't care about it. Using PEDs you can succeed at an old age.
                  It depends what you call prime,Floyd wasnt in his peak ,but prime maybe ,expiriance+Athletism he had left,ppl who are laughing at you are idiots who think only theyr definition is right,we can say he was still prime,as Pacquiao was ,they both definitly was takeing something,floyd pictures on scales post 30 look better then in mid 20.

                  But you shouldnt be suprised with this reaction cuse it real looks like you are looking for excuse for GGG(not saying you are),GGG have 3 very good years left.

                  Martinez knee was injured before a fight but 12 raund was nail in the coffin,surgery's and **** he never recovered,Moore is best example doe.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Mayweather definitely showed no physical decline. At 39 he was as fast as he'd ever been, his legs still fresh. Honestly, I've compared his prime movement with his "past prime" movement and his legs are still as strong and fast, he can make the same moves, and his stamina is the same. Since his come back I even got a floyd boy in agreement with me that he was more powerful and stronger at welterweight post comeback.

                    Only fight Mayweather actually looked old is vs Berto. Dunno if he just didn't train as much or juice as hard. But with that said I'm not sure that can be all PED's, I mean keeping father time away with PED's in his late 30's? Maybe I've been underestimating them, but likely genetics in play too.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by SplitSecond View Post
                      Mayweather definitely showed no physical decline. At 39 he was as fast as he'd ever been, his legs still fresh. Honestly, I've compared his prime movement with his "past prime" movement and his legs are still as strong and fast, he can make the same moves, and his stamina is the same. Since his come back I even got a floyd boy in agreement with me that he was more powerful and stronger at welterweight post comeback.

                      Only fight Mayweather actually looked old is vs Berto. Dunno if he just didn't train as much or juice as hard. But with that said I'm not sure that can be all PED's, I mean keeping father time away with PED's in his late 30's? Maybe I've been underestimating them, but likely genetics in play too.
                      Work ethic pluse PEDs and ofc good genetics thats right,nobody will say me this guy was so fresh at this age with no PEDs,ecpecialy that he is training so much ,he would get washed up just from this work in gym LMAO.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP