Is daring to be great frowned upon now?

[Mr. Objectivity]

I think your definition of fact needs to be revisited. If you mean the opinion of some salty online fanboys, then you'd be right.

Nope not really. Do a poll. I assure floyds resume isnt an ATG resume.

[Kigali]

floyd never dared to be great. He never fought prime fighters.

He convinced the younger generation that you could almost talk yourself into greatness without a great resume, all you need to do is say it frequent enough, loud enough and always play the victim.

Such a lying butt-hurt little Rican.

[Mr. Objectivity]

Such a lying butt-hurt little Rican.

hes retired yet his legacy of cherry picking will live forever.

[Kigali]

hes retired yet his legacy of cherry picking will live forever.

Whatever helps you trudge through that ****ty thing you call a life.

At least he didn't get swindled out of his fortune like Tito's wobbling ass.

He only fought ONE Champ in SEVEN years....LOL

That Reeker is king of Cherry pickers.

[Mr. Objectivity]

Whatever helps you trudge through that ****ty thing you call a life.

At least he didn't get swindled out of his fortune like Tito's wobbling ass.

He only fought ONE Champ in SEVEN years.

That Reeker is king of Cherry pickers.

Nah. When you say cherry picker, floyds name is the only one that comes out. deservingly so.

Nobody can question Titos greatness.

Floyd mayweather being broke in the future is inevitable.

[LoadedWraps]

Nope not really. Do a poll. I assure floyds resume isnt an ATG resume.

A poll is simply a gathering of opinions, it doesn't make the majority vote correct, or fact, it simply means it's the most popular.

We know two things now for certain:

1. You aren't objective as your name implies.

2. You don't know much about the sport of boxing. You can't, or you wouldn't make such a ludicrous statement without substantial evidence of knowledgable minds supporting it, in a large enough number for it to be relevant.

[Mr. Objectivity]

A poll is simply a gathering of opinions, it doesn't make the majority vote correct, or fact, it simply means it's the most popular.

We know two things now for certain:

1. You aren't objective as your name implies.

2. You don't know much about the sport of boxing. You can't, or you wouldn't make such a ludicrous statement without substantial evidence of knowledgable minds supporting it, in a large enough number for it to be relevant.

says the guy that had a poll of floyd vs lomachenko at 126.
and Sal sanchez at 130? Ok. whatever you say.

[BrometheusBob.]

Nope not really. Do a poll. I assure floyds resume isnt an ATG resume.

Actually I did.

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=683006

96.7% of the voters said Mayweather was an ATG, over 80% put him in the top 50 boxers of all time.

I've seen a similar thread that had more granular options and the most popular choices were top 11-20 and top 21-30 IIRC.

[Kigali]

Nah. When you say cherry picker, floyds name is the only one that comes out. deservingly so.

Nobody can question Titos greatness.

Floyd mayweather being broke in the future is inevitable.

Tito "greatness" is more of a question than Floyd's.

If Floyd does go broke...you won't be around to see it.

Tito is already broke...his dumb ass got swindled out of his fortune

Tito did more ducking at 147 than a shell-shocked Vietnam Vet at a fireworks show.

[Kigali]

says the guy that had a poll of floyd vs lomachenko at 126.
and Sal sanchez at 130? Ok. whatever you say.

Why do you use Black Americans in your Avi?

Don't you have any greats of your own kind?