Comments Thread For: Brook Mentions Spence, But Talks Thurman-Garcia, Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kigali
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jun 2016
    • 17128
    • 263
    • 0
    • 19,441

    #11
    Originally posted by satiev1
    Brook beats them all. He batters thurman easy ud. Spence is a 50 50 fight.
    If Brook is that good...he's doing a damn good job hiding it.

    Brook couldn't easilly beat Carson Jones...or Shenchenko...the guy Paulie beat with ease..

    Comment

    • Edward90
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Aug 2016
      • 875
      • 47
      • 115
      • 8,396

      #12
      A simple mention of Spence, but it seems like he would prefer a unification and/or big money fight that going forward with his mandatory. He's definitely advertising for someone to allow him to give step aside money to Spence. I hate that Spence will be on the shelf for all this time until Brook makes up his mind in Feb. Such crap. This will be a good fight if it plays out. I'm looking forward to seeing what Spence can do as he continues to up his competition level...

      And once again, for like the hundredth time, he is complaining about cutting weight. If it's such an issue, he should move up instead of trying to have the size advantage at 147. He's starting to get on my nerves because he's talking about big fights with a fairly weak resume. Only fight worth mentioning is the Porter fight. He's Khan with a belt. I wish they both fought each other. If I'm lucky, they would both knock each other out.

      Comment

      • .:: JSFD26 ::.
        Brawski
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2012
        • 33329
        • 725
        • 432
        • 44,762

        #13
        Originally posted by Illmatic94
        he admits making 147 will kill his body.. there goes the excuse if Spence beats him. why you guys want that fight now?
        He said before (after the GGG fight) that he could make 147. I highly doubt it and if he did I don't think it would be a healthy 147 at all. I would not fancy Brook's chances vs ANY WW unless he took on a tune up first at 147 and shows to be healthy at the weight.

        Comment

        • .:: JSFD26 ::.
          Brawski
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2012
          • 33329
          • 725
          • 432
          • 44,762

          #14
          Originally posted by Kigali
          If Brook is that good...he's doing a damn good job hiding it.

          Brook couldn't easilly beat Carson Jones...or Shenchenko...the guy Paulie beat with ease..
          Same **** was said prior to the Porter fight and it was used as an argument as to why he would lose to Porter.

          I also remember the "Senchenko wobbled him so Porter will stop him" arguments. And the "Senchenko wobbled him so GGG will stretch him out" arguments.

          Triangle theories... I love 'em. Keep 'em coming doe. They show your vast knowledge in boxing.
          Last edited by .:: JSFD26 ::.; 12-05-2016, 01:53 PM.

          Comment

          • Kigali
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2016
            • 17128
            • 263
            • 0
            • 19,441

            #15
            Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.
            Same **** was said prior to the Porter fight and it was used as an argument as to why he would lose to Porter.

            Triangle theories... I love 'em. Keep 'em coming doe.
            Ahhh yes....
            .....the dreaded Shaun Porter.

            Who cares what you love doe.

            I remember when it was said Spence won't stop Algeri because Pac couldn't do it...soon as he stopped him,they moved the goal post.

            Brook wants no parts of Spence.

            Comment

            • bambam182
              Banned
              • Oct 2013
              • 3421
              • 301
              • 124
              • 5,046

              #16
              why is everyone so high on spence?

              brook takes him out.

              Comment

              • Kigali
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2016
                • 17128
                • 263
                • 0
                • 19,441

                #17
                Originally posted by bambam182
                why is everyone so high on spence?

                brook takes him out.
                A better question is why is everyone so high on Brook?

                Brook was hurt badly by Malinaggi leftovers,Schenchenko.

                Comment

                • Marcov
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 40438
                  • 4,613
                  • 8,724
                  • 92,214

                  #18
                  Brook should test the waters at junior middleweight.

                  Comment

                  • Kigali
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jun 2016
                    • 17128
                    • 263
                    • 0
                    • 19,441

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Marcov
                    Brook should test the waters at junior middleweight.
                    There's nothing at 154 for him but ass-whippings.

                    Comment

                    • LacedUp
                      Still Smokin'
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 29171
                      • 781
                      • 381
                      • 132,163

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Kigali
                      A better question is why is everyone so high on Brook?

                      Brook was hurt badly by Malinaggi leftovers,Schenchenko.
                      that's just not true.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP