Comments Thread For: Brook Mentions Spence, But Talks Thurman-Garcia, Pacquiao
Collapse
-
A simple mention of Spence, but it seems like he would prefer a unification and/or big money fight that going forward with his mandatory. He's definitely advertising for someone to allow him to give step aside money to Spence. I hate that Spence will be on the shelf for all this time until Brook makes up his mind in Feb. Such crap. This will be a good fight if it plays out. I'm looking forward to seeing what Spence can do as he continues to up his competition level...
And once again, for like the hundredth time, he is complaining about cutting weight. If it's such an issue, he should move up instead of trying to have the size advantage at 147. He's starting to get on my nerves because he's talking about big fights with a fairly weak resume. Only fight worth mentioning is the Porter fight. He's Khan with a belt. I wish they both fought each other. If I'm lucky, they would both knock each other out.Comment
-
He said before (after the GGG fight) that he could make 147. I highly doubt it and if he did I don't think it would be a healthy 147 at all. I would not fancy Brook's chances vs ANY WW unless he took on a tune up first at 147 and shows to be healthy at the weight.Comment
-
I also remember the "Senchenko wobbled him so Porter will stop him" arguments. And the "Senchenko wobbled him so GGG will stretch him out" arguments.
Triangle theories... I love 'em. Keep 'em coming doe. They show your vast knowledge in boxing.Last edited by .:: JSFD26 ::.; 12-05-2016, 01:53 PM.Comment
-
.....the dreaded Shaun Porter.
Who cares what you love doe.
I remember when it was said Spence won't stop Algeri because Pac couldn't do it...soon as he stopped him,they moved the goal post.
Brook wants no parts of Spence.Comment
Comment