PS: Roman and GGG are great at doing what they do but they take a lot of hits so I am not 100% sure about their elite level skills. Kovalev and Loma go after their opponents but I don't see them getting squared up like that and getting blasted. So if physicality is a skill then Gonzales and GGG belong. If it wasn't for their physicality they can't do what they do simple as that
Can't take a type of list like this seriously without you having Fury in the top 2.
Don't forget his great def, how he eats uppercuts is a thing to behold.
Every fighter gets hit. Ward has been dropped twice. Floyd got hit clean 3 times by mosley. If you're looking to nitpick 1 uppercut landed on ggg then you're doing a horrible job.
Every fighter gets hit. Ward has been dropped twice. Floyd got hit clean 3 times by mosley. If you're looking to nitpick 1 uppercut landed on ggg then you're doing a horrible job.
PS: Roman and GGG are great at doing what they do but they take a lot of hits so I am not 100% sure about their elite level skills. Kovalev and Loma go after their opponents but I don't see them getting squared up like that and getting blasted. So if physicality is a skill then Gonzales and GGG belong. If it wasn't for their physicality they can't do what they do simple as that
Ok, I want you to answer a simple question, based on simply skills, what has made you rank Crawford above an ATG?
I said in no particular order. I don't have Crawdord as number 1
Ok fair enough but then let's talk about the rest of your assumption: that somehow skill can be gauged without relevant or truly top class opposition. Why do you think that is the case ?
Ok fair enough but then let's talk about the rest of your assumption: that somehow skill can be gauged without relevant or truly top class opposition. Why do you think that is the case ?
Read my earlier posts. I've already given my opinion on this.
Comment