Why Are Some People Ranking Lomachenko Over Crawford??

[Sadiqkingofko]

Lomachenko won two titles by either fighting for the vacant belt or going for the weakest title holder, while Crawford is Lineal champ in two weights and unified at Light Welterweight. No one should rank Lomachenko higher than Crawford.

[HanzGruber]

probably because of the eye test cause he clearly has skills.. but yea bud has done more

depends what you weigh heavier

[BoxingFan85]

Are we talking about p4p!? Then Yes, Lomas last win put him over Crawford..

[1hourRun]

You can look like a million dollars with the right opponent....just don't put him in there with Salidoe.

[Redd Foxx]

Because they're excited. Loma just had a great win and Bud is about to take a weak fight.
Crawford belongs a little higher but it's close. I'd have Loma first if it wasn't for that damned Salido always messing things up.

[g27region]

Crawford is in my top 5 p4p but I rate Lomachenko higher only because GRJ and Walters > overhyped bum Postol and small Gamboa

[Godsfly]

i like lomachenko but i have no clue where guys have come from ranking lomachenko higher then bud. even they themselves can't explain it I've only gotten the "eye test" crap


lundy
burns
Dulorme
gamboa
Beltran
unified/postol

i have no clue.......it's ridiculous. like i said it's strictly on the imaginary eye test and how people feel vs actual accomplishments.

[M Bison]

Terence Crawford only has one good win I mean people don't count the GGG win over Brook as much even though Brook weighed more than him on fight night and wtihin the 30 weighin period so why should Gamboa be considered a good win for Crawford a 5ft2 midget who was small for that weight he fought a massive TC at?

Victor Postol is the only good win Crawford has is that better than a lightning fast hand Gary Russell Jr?
Is that better than a then undefeated Nicholas Walters?....
Ehhhhhhhh nah it's not, I could accept people rating Lomachenko above GGG with Crawford being behind GGG and Carl Frampton afterall Frampton beat Quigg and LSC much better than Postol.

[Godsfly]

Crawford is in my top 5 p4p but I rate Lomachenko higher only because GRJ and Walters > overhyped bum Postol and small Gamboa

lundy
burns
Dulorme
gamboa
Beltran
unified/postol

do you really think lomachenko should be ranked higher with Russell martinez & walters? like..........seriously?

[Godsfly]

Terence Crawford only has one good win I mean people don't count the GGG win over Brook as much even though Brook weighed more than him on fight night and wtihin the 30 weighin period so why should Gamboa be considered a good win for Crawford a 5ft2 midget who was small for that weight he fought a massive TC at?

Victor Postol is the only good win Crawford has is that better than a lightning fast hand Gary Russell Jr?
Is that better than a then undefeated Nicholas Walters?....
Ehhhhhhhh nah it's not, I could accept people rating Lomachenko above GGG with Crawford being behind GGG and Carl Frampton afterall Frampton beat Quigg and LSC much better than Postol.

lomachenko, & most certainly golovkin are not above crawford.

russell fought bums other then gonzelez.

how does russell have any better resume then Beltran who broke burns jaw?
martinez russell walters is better then

lundy
burns
Dulorme
gamboa
Beltran
unified/postol?

are u on drugs my friend?

the problem is crawford has put in more work then lomachenko and undoubtedly deserves to be higher.

and don't get me started on golovkin. lomachenko is higher then golovkin with 7 fights for goodness sakes