Why Are Some People Ranking Lomachenko Over Crawford??

[CatchAndShoot]

So you're telling me that Gamboa/Crawford fight wasn't close and competitive before the KO? You're telling me that Gamboa wasn't outboxing Crawford in first rounds?

Man, even Crawford saying that it was his toughest fight in career

No ****, I'm talking about overall, and after the fact. As soon as TC found his rhythm and timing, it was a blood bath for Gamboa.

Hell, Judah was successful against Floyd for the first 4 rounds, but no one calls that a close fight after the fact. Are you setiosuly this slow?

[Hype job]

i like lomachenko but i have no clue where guys have come from ranking lomachenko higher then bud. even they themselves can't explain it I've only gotten the "eye test" crap


lundy
burns
Dulorme
gamboa
Beltran
unified/postol

i have no clue.......it's ridiculous. like i said it's strictly on the imaginary eye test and how people feel vs actual accomplishments.

postol and gamboa are the only 2 worth a damn on that list.

They're not really that far behind on resume.

[g27region]

No ****, I'm talking about overall, and after the fact. As soon as TC found his rhythm and timing, it was a blood bath for Gamboa.

Hell, Judah was successful against Floyd for the first 4 rounds, but no one calls that a close fight after the fact. Are you setiosuly this slow?

Now you compare 4 rounds in the fight that went full distance with a fight that ended with KO and where MOST of the rounds were competitive, ha ha

Yes, a good start against fighters like TC doesn't mean nothing but you also can't deny that the weight difference played the role in the fight, especially in the later rounds

*****, just shut up already, I'm getting tired of your ass. You sound like an imbecile with down syndrome, probably drooling over your keyboard and ****

[CatchAndShoot]

Now you compare 4 rounds in the fight that went full distance with a fight that ended with KO and where MOST of the rounds were competitive, ha ha

Yes, a good start against fighters like TC doesn't mean nothing but you also can't deny that the weight difference played the role in the fight, especially in the later rounds

*****, just shut up already, I'm getting tired of your ass. You sound like an imbecile with down syndrome, probably drooling over your keyboard and ****

Of course the weight difference made a big part of the win for TC. Gamboa still signed up for the fight. And I was rooting for Boa in that fight.

Hah ur funny

[JmH Reborn]

Burns beat Martinez lol, and Beltran and Burns had a draw, so Beltran had a draw with the guy that be Martinez, thus both are better than Martinez

I know - but where they were at, at the time the fights happened. Martinez was coming off two wars with Salido and Burns was coming off a draw, that he should have lost against Beltran. I think Martinez was in a better place

If Martinez and Burns fought at that timeframe instead of like 2009 or something when they did fight, Martinez would win I believe.

Like for me, Mayweather has a W over Pacquiao - but it's not more impressive over the W that Morales has over Pacquiao. That is where I was getting at with the Martinez > Burns component

[JmH Reborn]

Except that Burns beat Martinez already - took his "0" in fact.


I'm not entirely against the point you're making here, though.

See above for the rationale - you make good points too.

[A.K]

honestly I feel both are the number 1 and 2 guys in the world and all will be clear within the next year.