James "Boilermaker" Jeffries - The ORIGINAL "Great White Hope" Appreciation Thread

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nay_Sayer
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2011
    • 3837
    • 182
    • 1
    • 49,922

    #71
    Originally posted by therealpugilist
    the sad part about it is, deep down inside, there are posters who live through the fighters just as they did in the past. They have inferiority complex and like nothing more than to see TOP black fighters lose to Whites or whatever great Hope they nominate


    Its Posters on here that were so desperate for a great white hope that they didnt care if the "hope" was white anymore....i.e. Pacquaio was the hope to rid us of Mayweather....GGG(an asian by DNA and geographic nationality) was supposed to rid us of Ward or Floyd.......Kovalev(who is one of my favorite fighter) got a boost in fans and supporters on NSB when he was lined up to fight Ward even though this great fighter never had much hype on this site before it.
    ^This right here...

    Comment

    • billeau2
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2012
      • 27641
      • 6,397
      • 14,933
      • 339,839

      #72
      Originally posted by therealpugilist
      his overrated azz can lick my black balls.....legend my azz....dude wouldnt fight the best.....Harry Wills and George Godfrey wouldve been better than Carpentier and others
      The stench of your bs is getting hard to take...Wills was a relative unknown in many respects, its at the very least debatable that he was better than Carpentier. Do some research on the man before you user him to inflammatory effect how bout it? Dempsey had about as much to say about who he fought as most fighters do now a days BTW. blame the media for the great white hoax game, it was perpetuated by Jack London and his ilk (someone who should know better) look it up!!!

      And 70% of us have Ghengis Khan's genes, does that mean genetically one race or another is dominant? And what race would that be? what 30% of that race? Healthiest dogs there are: Mutts, rescue dogs. All kinds of genes! BTW genetics and race are distinct: one is a biological construct the other social. Genetically a white Scandinavian can have more in common with a Black Pygmy under certain conditions than with a fellow Caucasian. So keep up with the fairy tales and amuse the idiots by all means.

      Comment

      • LoadedWraps
        Official NSB POTY 2016
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 24267
        • 1,021
        • 1,468
        • 190,165

        #73
        Originally posted by therealpugilist
        his overrated azz can lick my black balls.....legend my azz....dude wouldnt fight the best.....Harry Wills and George Godfrey wouldve been better than Carpentier and others
        Originally posted by billeau2
        The stench of your bs is getting hard to take...Wills was a relative unknown in many respects, its at the very least debatable that he was better than Carpentier. Do some research on the man before you user him to inflammatory effect how bout it? Dempsey had about as much to say about who he fought as most fighters do now a days BTW. blame the media for the great white hoax game, it was perpetuated by Jack London and his ilk (someone who should know better) look it up!!!

        And 70% of us have Ghengis Khan's genes, does that mean genetically one race or another is dominant? And what race would that be? what 30% of that race? Healthiest dogs there are: Mutts, rescue dogs. All kinds of genes! BTW genetics and race are distinct: one is a biological construct the other social. Genetically a white Scandinavian can have more in common with a Black Pygmy under certain conditions than with a fellow Caucasian. So keep up with the fairy tales and amuse the idiots by all means.
        Dis gon be gud

        Comment

        • SouthPawHitman
          Tom Brady=GOAT
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2013
          • 7979
          • 700
          • 2,346
          • 41,233

          #74
          The Great Irish Hope is more accurate but whatever. I was at that fight,and man Johnson did a great job. He took Jefferies apart.

          Comment

          • billeau2
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2012
            • 27641
            • 6,397
            • 14,933
            • 339,839

            #75
            Originally posted by LoadedWraps
            Dis gon be gud

            One boiler maker comin up.

            Comment

            • therealpugilist
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2012
              • 14612
              • 561
              • 4
              • 45,735

              #76
              Originally posted by billeau2
              The stench of your bs is getting hard to take...Wills was a relative unknown in many respects, its at the very least debatable that he was better than Carpentier. Do some research on the man before you user him to inflammatory effect how bout it? Dempsey had about as much to say about who he fought as most fighters do now a days BTW. blame the media for the great white hoax game, it was perpetuated by Jack London and his ilk (someone who should know better) look it up!!!

              And 70% of us have Ghengis Khan's genes, does that mean genetically one race or another is dominant? And what race would that be? what 30% of that race? Healthiest dogs there are: Mutts, rescue dogs. All kinds of genes! BTW genetics and race are distinct: one is a biological construct the other social. Genetically a white Scandinavian can have more in common with a Black Pygmy under certain conditions than with a fellow Caucasian. So keep up with the fairy tales and amuse the idiots by all means.
              80% of you also have Neanderthal genes...Caucasian ...Caucasus/ eurasian origin

              You know Europe isn't a continent.... Right?

              Melanated equatorial people don't


              People today would rather come from a knuckle scrubber ape than a melanated man


              Ever heard of envy...." Battle royales" look @ those ****** boys go!!!

              Look across the world....every great civilization with great resources got date ****d, pillaged, diseased and suck dry by Europe

              Its not about "dominance"
              Its about science and math


              Go outside after five hours straight tell me how it feels

              Nobody is 100% but melanated GENES are dominant....green, blue, etc eyes is a recessive HUMAN trait...so is white skin


              Do you have to ask why, in a country run by whites, for whites, don't want to see a dominant melanated man aa champ?



              Y'all like trained coons.....Manny getting dry ****ed by top rank but he humble doe?


              **** all that


              Is he a winner Or loser....does he work hard...is he skilled?

              That's all that matters

              Comment

              • therealpugilist
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2012
                • 14612
                • 561
                • 4
                • 45,735

                #77
                Originally posted by billeau2
                The stench of your bs is getting hard to take...Wills was a relative unknown in many respects, its at the very least debatable that he was better than Carpentier. Do some research on the man before you user him to inflammatory effect how bout it? Dempsey had about as much to say about who he fought as most fighters do now a days BTW. blame the media for the great white hoax game, it was perpetuated by Jack London and his ilk (someone who should know better) look it up!!!

                And 70% of us have Ghengis Khan's genes, does that mean genetically one race or another is dominant? And what race would that be? what 30% of that race? Healthiest dogs there are: Mutts, rescue dogs. All kinds of genes! BTW genetics and race are distinct: one is a biological construct the other social. Genetically a white Scandinavian can have more in common with a Black Pygmy under certain conditions than with a fellow Caucasian. So keep up with the fairy tales and amuse the idiots by all means.

                Wills, Sam McVey, joe jeanette, Sam Langford, George Godfrey, Were all around in the teens and 20s....most of the


                Oh so Dempsey didn't draw the color Lind.....I'll wait.......1920-1926 wills was ranked smashing the old guard and ready for the mauler

                Comment

                • therealpugilist
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2012
                  • 14612
                  • 561
                  • 4
                  • 45,735

                  #78
                  Originally posted by SouthPawHitman
                  The Great Irish Hope is more accurate but whatever. I was at that fight,and man Johnson did a great job. He took Jefferies apart.
                  Damn gramps 100+ years strong lol

                  Comment

                  • billeau2
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2012
                    • 27641
                    • 6,397
                    • 14,933
                    • 339,839

                    #79
                    Originally posted by therealpugilist
                    80% of you also have Neanderthal genes...Caucasian ...Caucasus/ eurasian origin

                    You know Europe isn't a continent.... Right?

                    Melanated equatorial people don't


                    People today would rather come from a knuckle scrubber ape than a melanated man


                    Ever heard of envy...." Battle royales" look @ those ****** boys go!!!

                    Look across the world....every great civilization with great resources got date ****d, pillaged, diseased and suck dry by Europe

                    Its not about "dominance"
                    Its about science and math


                    Go outside after five hours straight tell me how it feels

                    Nobody is 100% but melanated GENES are dominant....green, blue, etc eyes is a recessive HUMAN trait...so is white skin


                    Do you have to ask why, in a country run by whites, for whites, don't want to see a dominant melanated man aa champ?



                    Y'all like trained coons.....Manny getting dry ****ed by top rank but he humble doe?


                    **** all that


                    Is he a winner Or loser....does he work hard...is he skilled?

                    That's all that matters
                    The aryan invasion, where Caucasoid stock went across the world and wound up in India, passing such places as Aryan (Iran/persia) Russia, Europa...is actually a tale of "stone soup." You know the tale of stone soup? where two smart guys enter a stand off village and proclaim "Ok ok me and my friend will make for you a delicious recipe from our home, stone soup" whereupon the two produce a stone and instruct the villlagers to each bring something: carrots, a pot, water, a chicken, celery...you get the idea... The Aryans got enculturated in each place they went... Just like the Mongols who conquered China and became Chinese.

                    The Dravidian culture of India actually civilized the Aryans...you had great civilizations existing there where as the Aryans were hunters and gatherers.

                    So this idea that any color brought progress is not so. Its just not historically accurate.

                    Neither are any theories that try to use physical means as dominant traits. People adapt to the physical environment, that is why we change over time.

                    Now...the origins of man? different issue. I don't believe Darwin's theories account for that...long story a different time but...I don't think we are necessarily native to the earth. It has not been proven thats for sure! Darwin'sn theories break down time scale wise
                    Last edited by billeau2; 12-29-2016, 11:11 AM.

                    Comment

                    • billeau2
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2012
                      • 27641
                      • 6,397
                      • 14,933
                      • 339,839

                      #80
                      Originally posted by therealpugilist
                      Wills, Sam McVey, joe jeanette, Sam Langford, George Godfrey, Were all around in the teens and 20s....most of the


                      Oh so Dempsey didn't draw the color Lind.....I'll wait.......1920-1926 wills was ranked smashing the old guard and ready for the mauler
                      Willis is often lionized again, look up his age, whom he lost to, whom he fought...Did you know they fought a common opponent whom Dempsey beat? Willis lost... Also, Dempsey did not have the say in whom he fought as much as people think. Blame the media. They made it abhorent for him to fight the guys you mention above. He was marketed to make money because him and Babe Ruth became the first sports superstars in many respects.

                      Also, if memory serves correct, many of the guys above were pretty old at this time? There may have been some good fights to be made, but not sure if it was that wide open. And Willis, whom I am quite fond of, was a bit hyped regrding Dempsey if the truth be known.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP