I have a lot of respect for Marquez but I don't agree with him. Maybe something got lost in translation. I'm thinking he's saying Kovalev with the one loss and Golovkin being undefeated put him higher in his personal ranking. I saw a lot of good things from Kovalev against Ward. That KD punch was a thing of beauty. Also his timely jabs kept Ward guessing and unsure in the beginning. I've seen enough of Golovkin to think he has good boxing skills but he's yet to prove it against an opponent of Wards' caliber.
Comments Thread For: Juan Manuel Marquez: Kovalev's Loss Showed Golovkin is Better
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Nah. And GGG is two divisions smaller so why what he would do vs Ward relevant?GGG is absolutely not better or as diverse, skilled or as big.
Kovalevs far more precise, uses angles better, better combination puncher, far better counter puncher.
I know its not a popular opinion but its night and day and he's shown it at at the highest level.
GGG gets whitewashed by Ward
Kovalev is flatout better than GGG in every department.Comment
-
I'm fan of JMM but this was very ******
First of all, Golovking never faced a guy of elite, and least with the style of Ward.
Second, who the people like to watch is not important, Rigo is better than all the fighters of the world and?
Third. Gonzalez ended the fight vs Cuadras with his face made **** and that was a controversial fight.
CUADRAS is a great boxer but not in the level of Ward. So?Comment
-
True. But if GGG and Ward fought each other, then either Ward would be drained or GGG would be giving up a lot of weight, depending on what weight they fought at.Comment
-
he still walked away with 3 titles ROFL, from the guy all of you said he was "ducking."Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment