lomachenko- pound for pound number 1?

[The Big Dunn]

cause im waiting for an active fighter to put the bar high.

Seriously dude I don't get it. the bar for these guys is so low. I give him full credit but how can you seriously have him ahead of someone like Danny Garcia or Canelo given who they fought and defeated?

Same with SvenSvenSven. His skillset is tremendous, no doubt about it. But he hasn't defeated anyone. His resume is much worse than Loma's, yet people have him as #2.

Basically all these guys have to do is either KO bums or defeat 1 or 2 world class fighters (and really, what is Gary Russell?) to get ranked p4p.

Not fair at all.

[Madison Boxing]

Seriously dude I don't get it. the bar for these guys is so low. I give him full credit but how can you seriously have him ahead of someone like Danny Garcia or Canelo given who they fought and defeated?

Same with SvenSvenSven. His skillset is tremendous, no doubt about it. But he hasn't defeated anyone. His resume is much worse than Loma's, yet people have him as #2.

Basically all these guys have to do is either KO bums or defeat 1 or 2 world class fighters (and really, what is Gary Russell?) to get ranked p4p.

Not fair at all.

who else is there? Garcia- fought a load of bums recently and should have losses against herrera and peterson. Canelo- how can the pound for pound number 1 be a ducker? and he lost every round to mayweather which is something hard for me to forget. GGG wouldnt be up there in past years and im his biggest fan, doesnt have an elite name on his cv but hes been so dominant that hes as high up as anyone for me. Gonzalez objetively has the best CV but i cant put a flyweight or whatever the **** he is as my p4p number 1, as crude as that sounds.

[P4PLoser]

Seriously dude I don't get it. the bar for these guys is so low. I give him full credit but how can you seriously have him ahead of someone like Danny Garcia or Canelo given who they fought and defeated?

Same with SvenSvenSven. His skillset is tremendous, no doubt about it. But he hasn't defeated anyone. His resume is much worse than Loma's, yet people have him as #2.

Basically all these guys have to do is either KO bums or defeat 1 or 2 world class fighters (and really, what is Gary Russell?) to get ranked p4p.

Not fair at all.

Its not always about resume, look at his skills. If you cant see that, I suggest you buy some glasses

[Larry the boss]

Its not always about resume, look at his skills. If you cant see that, I suggest you buy some glasses

you have to prove those skills against elite comp man..and it is hard to forget him losing to a guy like Salido

[The Hammer]

you have to prove those skills against elite comp man..and it is hard to forget him losing to a guy like Salido

He was robbed in that fight, and the ref was allowing Salido to fight dirty.

And let's not forget, Salido was MUCH heavier and didn't even try to make weight.

Are you against Lomachenko for the same reason you are against Kovalev and Golovkin? It's very hypocritical for YOU to call anyone else a racist.

[Madison Boxing]

He was robbed in that fight, and the ref was allowing Salido to fight dirty.

And let's not forget, Salido was MUCH heavier and didn't even try to make weight.

Are you against Lomachenko for the same reason you are against Kovalev and Golovkin? It's very hypocritical for YOU to call anyone else a racist.

makes me laugh, get a lot of people like larry on here who support lots of slick fighters, say they watch boxing to learn etc, appreciate the technical aspect of the sport. Yet none of them seem to like or rate lomachenko much, arguably the most technical fighter of them all. I wonder why...

[Larry the boss]

He was robbed in that fight, and the ref was allowing Salido to fight dirty.

And let's not forget, Salido was MUCH heavier and didn't even try to make weight.

Are you against Lomachenko for the same reason you are against Kovalev and Golovkin? It's very hypocritical for YOU to call anyone else a racist.

why were you not in Vegas? why were you not in that damn seat?? you are full of ****..you are a coward..I have no issue with none of those fighters.i have an issue with racist ass b1tches like you and you kkklan of posters who flood this board with you racist ass agenda..you are a disgrace to the human race and have a heart the size of an ants ball sack...you are pure pu22y

[The Hammer]

why were you not in Vegas? why were you not in that damn seat?? you are full of ****..you are a coward..I have no issue with none of those fighters.i have an issue with racist ass b1tches like you and you kkklan of posters who flood this board with you racist ass agenda..you are a disgrace to the human race and have a heart the size of an ants ball sack...you are pure pu22y

I searched for you but YOU WERE NOT THERE.

If you were there, prove it by posting a photo of your ticket stub, or a photo you took there.

[The Hammer]

makes me laugh, get a lot of people like larry on here who support lots of slick fighters, say they watch boxing to learn etc, appreciate the technical aspect of the sport. Yet none of them seem to like or rate lomachenko much, arguably the most technical fighter of them all. I wonder why...

Yes, I wonder what he has against Loma?

[Oxn]

Why bother being a boxing fan if you just want to base a fighters talent over resume?

If you can't see it with your own eyes and need something written on paper to realize talent, then you are in the wrong game.