She seems to favor activity more which would probably favor Lomachenko, but I understand the frustration; she's so inconsistent and her scorecards can turn up inexplicably wide - chances are she'll end up putting in a bad card for one fighter or the other. Would either fighter truly feel comfortable with her judging?
Comments Thread For: Another Judging Controversy Brewing Before Lomachenko-Walters
Collapse
-
-
Haven't seen all the fights reference but 48-47 Khan (3 rounds to 2) was about where the Alvarez fight was and, putting aside the names, I don't recall Cotto being able to be all that effective against Trout either.
From the sounds of it, Byrd doesn't play the "big name scorecard game" and that seems to have some promoters uneasy. lolComment
-
Walters deserves to get a scorecard or 2 in his favor after the atrocious scoring in the Sosa fight. That was a ****in robbery.Comment
-
Comment
-
She scored Abril rios for Abril. Top rank can't have her give an honest score card, bad for businessComment
-
my thoughts too ^. Didnt realise fighters had to hate each other before every fight.Comment
Comment