Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Froch: Who Has Golovkin Beaten? He's Too Small To Beat Me!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
    You're the little chihuahua that always following me around, yipping at me every time I say something about Golovkin. If I mention your name once, don't let it go to your head.
    Alright whatever. You don't figure in my thoughts at all. But if I see an objectionable post, I might set the guy straight whether you or some other a$$wipe

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
      You make concessions for guys bringing major money and time exposure, not guys off 300k viewers on BET
      You mean like Golovkin with Canelo? Oh wait.......... 160 or no fight.

      Golovkin wants everything to favour him.

      Comment


      • #53
        damn ggg is such a coward wanted froch at 166 no wonder the fight never took place lmfao. Typical ggg tactics, they say they want to fight this and that but always do some BS to get teh fight called off adn then they swear they ducked him lmfao naw you just did the ducking coward.

        Comment


        • #54
          Thank god for the reminder... i had forgotten Froch had beaten Groves in front of 80 000 people at Wembleys!

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Ryn0 View Post
            He's a long way off Hopkins record, he wasn't the real WBA champion until he beat Geale. Sturm was the 'super' WBA champion which is BS.

            He absolutely wasn't the champion beating bloody Milton Nunez.
            GGG became the WBA middleweight champion when he beat Nilson Tapia after Felix Sturm's promoter bribed the WBA to bring back the super title and give it to Sturm so he didn't have to fight Golovkin, who was his mandatory challenger.

            Comment


            • #56
              It's easy to say "Who Has Golovkin Beaten? He's Too Small To Beat Me!"

              But when your a big name and say no to fighting him, you are part of the problem.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
                You mean like Golovkin with Canelo? Oh wait.......... 160 or no fight.

                Golovkin wants everything to favour him.
                It was a Mando and 3 belt unification, CW's don't apply. Though I'm sure it was negotiable, but Canelo didn't wanna negotiate cause his body wasn't ready

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by casheddie View Post
                  It's easy to say "Who Has Golovkin Beaten? He's Too Small To Beat Me!"

                  But when your a big name and say no to fighting him, you are part of the problem.
                  Unless the smaller name won't fight you on your terms.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    People still arguing about it

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                      You make concessions for guys bringing major money and time exposure, not guys off 300k viewers on BET
                      But I thought GGG was all about legacy? Who brings in the most "legacy" between Froch and Ward? Nvm turns out is all about the money now. Talked all that legacy bull**** just like anybody from 154-168 to attract the fanboys.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP