Pac lost at most 3 rounds, how the **** was that fight close!!
Vargas vs Pacquiao was a Draw / Pac's worst performance
Collapse
-
-
Sick, obsessed, delusional, lack of a life.
What ever you want to call it, you are a ****ING DUMBBB person
"Jessie Vargas only connected on 19 percent of his punches against Manny Pacquiao Saturday, according to CompuBox. That's the lowest connect percentage by a Pacquiao opponent since his controversial split-decision loss to Timothy Bradley in June 2012."--Yuup worste ever Bro. Keep hoping pacman will loseComment
-
-
Just like you had NSB posters saying Frampton vs Cruz was a close fight, some said Frampton won 9 rounds, and other including me, said Cruz actually retained it by a close fight.Sick, obsessed, delusional, lack of a life.
What ever you want to call it, you are a ****ING DUMBBB person
"Jessie Vargas only connected on 19 percent of his punches against Manny Pacquiao Saturday, according to CompuBox. That's the lowest connect percentage by a Pacquiao opponent since his controversial split-decision loss to Timothy Bradley in June 2012."--Yuup worste ever Bro. Keep hoping pacman will lose
As always, if its Pac, this fjcker has the most benefit of doubt to never lose a fight. feel sorry for the gullibles. I said this bout was a draw at best. Who was the last opposition to land clean flush straight rights on Pac like a Herrera snapping Garcia's head back?Comment
-
i agree...your mom's performance last night was better.First things first, Stephen A. Smith should never be allowed to commentate boxing again.
Second, to see a Twitter lower thirds graphic and TR commentary promoting it as a respectable scoring method turned this bout into a rainbow brite farce from public ownership
Third, I dont even recall Pac accomplishing traditional combos. When? No inside game, was just waiting for Vargas to attack, the defending Champ.
Sure Pac got a 2nd round Flash, but what after that? Pac had eaten 5 signifant rights throughout rounds clean, and both continued the work...
Also how can Pac acknowledge Crawford at 140 as no problem, yet doesnt bring up otherComment
Comment