Floyd Mayweather was exposed against Manny Pacquiao
Collapse
-
-
not true. do you remember hopkins-calzaghe? that went on for years and years with dirkdiggler. i thought it was fun. hopkins also landed the better cleaner punches in that fight so as you can see im being consistent and not a fanboy like you keep calling me.I have talked about why Floyd won a number of times with anyone that is rational. I will not with posters like you , Spoon23, rath, etc. until you admit your reason for this.
Thsi fight couldn't mean that much to you that you act with the emotional maturity of a 5 yr old over it.Comment
-
Cmon big Dunn, without PAC, we'd lose a lot of idiotic posters. But, you already knew this.Comment
-
actually the video shows a lot of floyd's punches being blocked and missed but was counted during the actual fight.
his trainer just said they won in a recent article so make your pick.Comment
-
where? time stamp them and count how many. im sure you will still see pac landed far more. you are trying to dismiss the whole video because of a couple errors. another logical fallacy. also some of floyd's counted punches were highly dubious but you don't point that out of course.Last edited by daggum; 11-03-2016, 03:39 PM.Comment
-
one fight? i've been the slow motion bandwagoner since hopkins-calzaghe to prove hopkins was landing clean and calzaghe wasn't. the same thing happened. people pretended even in spite of video evidence that calzaghe landed 220 punches. also done slow motion for pac-marquez 2 and 3 so not sure how i can be a pac fan from the philippines. marquez won 7 roudns in the second fight although the ref missed a knockdown(guess im a pac fan for pointing out how the ropes held marquez up) only a true fan would ignore that?F Floyd & f Manny is slow motion. They both got skills, but, they are both full of ****. Both have silly easily refutable excuses.
Castillo man handled Floyd is the first fight. Floyd lost, fact. Castillo did not need fake azz excuses as to why he lost. Castillo took his loss, like a man. I believe he was cheated. Maidana deserved a one point win or a draw. De la Hoya did way better than PAC did against Ployd. But, I believe Floyd won.
I've wanted someone, anyone to put Floyd on his azz.
Manny didn't beat Floyd. Sorry Bruh, I wish he would have dropped and stopped Floyd.
Floyd fans don't give me **** when I call Floyd a cheat, a hugger, etc
But, PAC A MANIACS are a different breed. Slow motion for only one fight. Biased, beyond belief. Why not slow motion fights that Marquez thought he won against PAC.
PAC is pulling a Floyd by fighting Vargas. Same crap as when Floyd fought Bertolucci, pure uncut shi1t.
I look forward to hearing from a real boxing fan like you.
Where in the Philippines do your people come from?
Before you ask me a sillier question, I'll tell you.
I am a Separdic ***. I define myself by my works.
Unlike many fanboys here, I don't latch onto any boxer.
I'm a big boy, I take my losses and smile. I don't care if PAC destroys everyone, or Floyd beats them by being an elusive fighter.
I often see you post and you obviously are your own man.Comment
-
Too much time and effort and the fight is clipped how do we know it even has all Mayweathers punches included? I posted a video earlier that had Mayweather outlanding Pacquiao you'll say the same about that.where? time stamp them and count how many. im sure you will still see pac landed far more. you are trying to dismiss the whole video because of a couple errors. another logical fallacy. also some of floyd's counted punches were highly dubious but you don't point that out of course.Comment
-
He didn't watch the video, that's why. Even if deep in his heart he thought Manny won, or let's say, he didn't think there was a real winner, and pretty much had it a draw, he'd say Floyd won, hands down, no questions asked.how can you watch the video and think floyd won? ignoring who is landing the cleaner punches is rational and impartial? how??? i can understand getting it wrong on the night of the fight watching it live like many did but you can't pretend to be impartial and rational now when you have the facts and choose to ignore them.
I mean, look at it, he's one of the 1st people to respond, because he gets so defensive about Floyd, and has to defend him at any cost.Comment

Comment