Originally posted by OnePunch
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Haymon exposes GBP slave contracts & shows why he's the smartest man in boxing.
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by DreamerUSA View PostI did'nt mean doing away with promoters. Promoters are integral to the sport for the reasons you listed. I'm just saying a more competitive market, like with purse bids, are better for the sport and for the fighters imo. I just think lock down contracts with promoters and networks are bad for the health of the sport. Prevents far too many fights from happening.Last edited by OnePunch; 11-02-2016, 12:51 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KRAFTSMAN View Post
It's just mind blowing how he has the stomach to use other people's money liberally without turning a profit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
Suing Haymon for Ali Act violation and simultaneously amending their contract to violate the Ali Act.
Promoters having a right of approval over managers is a violation of the Ali Act. There is supposed to be a strict separation between promoter and manager. Giving the promoter the right to prevent a fighter from signing a manager is illegal.
Comment
-
Guys lets talk about mario the accountant. Are you a fan or a hater?
He has a background in sales management but he went back to school to qualify for the CPA exam. I've seen mario groupies on this forum saying a background in sales can benefit anyone and blah blah blah. That he's the man, that he's revolutionizing the game. What's your take?Last edited by ////; 11-02-2016, 03:19 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View PostStop! Just stop! That's the way business has been done FOREVER! Haymon isn't doing anything that hasn't been done before in business. He got the money from a investment firm. THEY INVEST MONEY INTO OTHER PEOPLE BUSINESS!!! Who's money do you think Trump used when he bankrupted those casinos? Not his! Who's money do you think Facebook, Twitter, and other sites used when they were spending millions more than they took in? Not theirs. Haymon isn't doing anything different than
Comment
-
Originally posted by KRAFTSMAN View PostDon't know why you're mad bro. I was expressing my amazement.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View PostThey sign multi-fight deals for security, man - in theory there's advantages to the fighter too, especially in the event of taking a loss or something.
The taking a loss thing is one of the risks, but I'm sure there are built in clauses in promoter contracts now based on losing or bringing in less fans & all kinds of things like that so there probably isn't THAT much different on the bad side of things (believe Manny took a pay cut with this Vargas fight from his $18M-$20M/gtd), but sure its likely to be a lil worse if you freelance fight by fight & take a L or have some other thing negative go on then again its going to be a lil better if you freelance fight by fight on the good side.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BennyBlanco View PostSuch hypocrites at GBP.
Suing Haymon for Ali Act violation and simultaneously amending their contract to violate the Ali Act.
Promoters having a right of approval over managers is a violation of the Ali Act. There is supposed to be a strict separation between promoter and manager. Giving the promoter the right to prevent a fighter from signing a manager is illegal.
Comment
Comment