Oscar should hit Haymon with the number of mismatches he made. Mismatches are cheaper to make, very dangerous and unsafe for the underdog, who gets a fraction of the purse.
Oscar should hit Haymon with the number of mismatches he made. Mismatches are cheaper to make, very dangerous and unsafe for the underdog, who gets a fraction of the purse.
Not illegal, but questionable. Point is, Haymon's so-called concern for fighters is not across the board. He's only protecting his top fighter in a mismatch, obviously.
Not illegal, but questionable. Point is, Haymon's so-called concern for fighters is not across the board. He's only protecting his top fighter in a mismatch, obviously.
Fighters have the right to turn down fights that they don't feel comfortable with, so obvious the risk versus reward side of it works out fine, regardless of what you're implying.
The mismatch thing is a different subject than these proceedings but it is definitely the most dangerous thing going on in boxing. Prospects who are very talented should not get 20-0 with 18ko's by destroying guys who barely get paid and end up getting their brains bashed in. I don't care if they sign up for it. Many of these fights shouldn't be allowed. Many different en****** are guilty of this including Haymon, Oscar, etc.
Not illegal, but questionable. Point is, Haymon's so-called concern for fighters is not across the board. He's only protecting his top fighter in a mismatch, obviously.
So who would be at fault for glass jaw Khan vs Canelo? Oscar or Haymon?
Comment