Comments Thread For: Roach Admits: Crawford is NOT My Favorite Fight For Pacquiao

[Drunken Cat]

Considering pacman is almost 40 and been in alot of wars i dont blame them. But if crawford didnt ko postol which he probably could have he probably wont stop pacquiao

He's not almost 40, he's 37. He has been fighting for almost 21 years professionally though, and has had 66 fights, and has been at the world level for 19 of those 21 years.

It's a tough fight, but a very interesting match, and since they have the same promoter there aren't that many barriers.

[stuff jones]

Terrance is a hard fight period. Definitely harder than the floyd fight. As roach said "hes like a young mayweather" who himself was more aggressive and still had the high ring iq. Pacquiao, like canelo like it when guys come to him. But unlike canelo pacman is better at picking his shots. I think vargas is a bad fight for pacquiao. Hes definitely being overlooked. Pacquiao kinda peaked when he got ko'd by marquez imo

how the **** do you peak when you get ko'd? lol.

[aboutfkntime]

Only thing I disagree with is Cotto, cotto would have been in his prime or very very close... apart from that can't disagree

no way bro, not even close

Cotto had been battered by Margarito, he barely sc****d past Clottey, did not have a trainer, and was at the very lowest point in his career to-date..... he was also compromised by the weight.

Cotto was not even close to the top of his game, and was lucky to even be ranked in the top 5 at welter at that point in time.

Algieri was on top of his game, and likely Bradley was on top of his game - or close - in the first fight..... nobody else, they were all on the slide.

Matchmaking is all about styles/timing, Top Rank are the best.