Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Jacobs: WBA Denies Request To Modify Purse Bid Split

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
    unless you were present at the negotiations (which I doubt you were unless it was only for 60 seconds when you delivered their pizzas), then you havent the slightest idea what was or wasnt negotiated............

    they called for an early purse-bid

    you do the math ^^

    Comment


    • Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
      Jacobs knew the split and carried on so you do not have a point.

      What do you think of Jacobs if he walks away now robbing us of the fight?

      he should

      he should tell Team *****kin to go fk themselves

      he will go on to make other good fights

      whereas, that other Team will continue to ensure that top fights are "difficult" to make..... but will continue to sign the fights that they really want in "2 days"

      yep, if Team Bull**** don't wanna play fair, Jacobs should tell them to kick rocks

      Comment


      • Originally posted by BlakBread904 View Post
        I feel sorry for anyone who buys into your schtick...or are you that dumb?

        Anyway....I predicted Danny would vacate months ago. getting the same payday vs GGG as you got vs Quillin would make a less-confident man think twice HAHA

        I want to see this fight but not because of Danny Jacobs, I don't see him lasting past 5 rounds.

        are you an idiot ?

        how could you possibly endorse Jacobs getting paid "Quillin money"?

        why would you f@ggots fixate on how much a fighter makes to the point where you think it is fair that he takes what is essentially a pay-cut?

        I don't give a fk about Jacobs money, I can just see the distinct pattern of Team Bull**** laying out the red carpet to fight the guys who they REALLY want to fight, but then making things "difficult" for the guys they are happy to pass on.

        Team Bull**** clearly do not value this fight as much as the fans do.

        Comment


        • Jacobs would've been better off not having a belt. For being better than the rest of GGG's opponents he's going to get paid less.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by T.M.T View Post
            75 to 25 no way. screw that crap. Jacobs deserves more than that

            obviously !

            and Team Bull****'s request to force an early purse-bid is a clear sign of their unwillingness to negotiate in good faith

            Comment


            • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              he should

              he should tell Team *****kin to go fk themselves

              he will go on to make other good fights

              whereas, that other Team will continue to ensure that top fights are "difficult" to make..... but will continue to sign the fights that they really want in "2 days"

              yep, if Team Bull**** don't wanna play fair, Jacobs should tell them to kick rocks
              What % do you reckon Danny deserves AFT? Myself I reckon probably 30 - 35% would be fair, but I still think he would be well advised to take it even at the mandated 25% split, fair or not.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by sicko View Post
                Jacobs is basically the WBA Assistant Champion why does this second title exist anyway?
                Well hes being promoted by pbc as a "real" MW champ. When in realty this is nothing more then a interim belt.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                  obviously !

                  and Team Bull****'s request to force an early purse-bid is a clear sign of their unwillingness to negotiate in good faith
                  Jacobs goes to the WBA first = K2 not negotiating in good faith.

                  How do you come to these redundant conclusions.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Gillie View Post
                    Yes but the GGG vs Canelo fight is absolutely going to happen. I think he should have taken the 10 million as I had posted before but the real difference is that Jacobs only has a regular title as leverage and that isn't much unfortunately. That said, GGG should focus less on the money and more on getting a real challenge in the ring as it negatively impacts him if the fight doesn't come off. His team has to start accenting their responsibility for some of these fights not coming off. Peace.

                    who cares about leverage ?

                    if Team Bull**** were willing to negotiate in good faith, that would be a complete non-issue

                    they were able to sign Kell Brook in 2 minutes, because they were willing to split the pot more fairly with Eddie Hearn

                    and the reason why they were willing to split the pot more fairly with Eddie Hearn, is because they REALLY wanted to fight Kell Brook

                    they don't give a fk if Jacobs passes on the money..... that way they can spin the fans another "dey duckin doe" story and proceed to fight yet another no-hoper for an easy 2mil

                    this **** is sooooo obvious, and is getting sooooo old SMH

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
                      I seem to remember a lot of GGG critics wanting a purse bid so Haymon would win and force Golovkin to vacate. What happened to that? You'd think these guys would be jumping for joy at the news of a purse bid...

                      when this negotiation started, we thought that you guys would be jumping for joy at the news of Golovkin finally landing what could be viewed as a meaningful fight?

                      But, no LMAO

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP