I agree Jacobs loses (and loses big) to GGG but the fight needs to happen. We're talking two of the best middleweights in the world, for what it's worth, and also a bout that is intriguing and would excite boxing fans. Jacobs has nowhere to go from here and I hear he is really adamant about making the fight happen. And similarly, GGG should be pushing for it as well because I can only imagine the type of crap bout his handlers will create if it doesn't.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GGG -Jacobs must happen
Collapse
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostI agree Jacobs loses (and loses big) to GGG but the fight needs to happen. We're talking two of the best middleweights in the world, for what it's worth, and also a bout that is intriguing and would excite boxing fans. Jacobs has nowhere to go from here and I hear he is really adamant about making the fight happen. And similarly, GGG should be pushing for it as well because I can only imagine the type of crap bout his handlers will create if it doesn't.
..how can you agree on something you don't knock jack about?
Comment
-
GGG should agree to whatever terms the WBA dictates. He shouldn't have to do more than that. He is the champion. If Jacobs won't fight him for the percentages the WBA says then that means Jacobs doesn't want to be the full champion bad enough to fight for it for the money the WBA says he deserves. GGG should move on and fight Saunders who claims he is ready to fight GGG in December if the GGG vs Jacobs fight doesn't happen. Both GGG and Jacobs should agree to the purse split the WBA dictates. After all it's the WBA world title that is up for the taking.
Comment
-
-
It's a mismatch same as any other opponent for GGG at 160. Who cares for mismatches they ain't competitive, true boxing fans want competitive match ups.
Comment
-
-
-
Comment