Have i missed something ? Cause suddenly on this site its gone from noone giving canelo a chance, to many people on here saying hes going to beat GGG!? Wouldnt mind hearing why people have changed their mind, were you that impressed by him beating khan in 6 rounds (longer than it took prescott and garcia) and taking 9 rounds to ko liam smith? Or has GGG suddenly started looking bad (Beating brook in 5 rounds and potentially ruining his career by fracturing his eye socket)? Cause im struggling to see where the shift in opinion is coming from, or are you lot just trolling? Is liam smith some amazing win or something, cause i'd be pretty damn sure that brook would be a heavy favourite at 154 against him.
The guy whos shared the ring with GGG, canelo himself, is so confident of beating him that he delayed fighting him for a year, apparantly to work his wa up to middleweight yet his first move was to fight at 154?!
I assume a lot of you are going to be making a lot of money from this fight if it gets made because golovkin is 1/4 and canelo is 11/4, so the bookies dont share your optimism. So im all ears as to why canelos going to beat him? Is it his great footwork (ive seen people move their feet in a swamp quicker) his fantastic power (couldnt stop cotto where pacquiao managed to) or his great defense (mayweather couldnt miss that big block head of his all night)?
The guy whos shared the ring with GGG, canelo himself, is so confident of beating him that he delayed fighting him for a year, apparantly to work his wa up to middleweight yet his first move was to fight at 154?!
I assume a lot of you are going to be making a lot of money from this fight if it gets made because golovkin is 1/4 and canelo is 11/4, so the bookies dont share your optimism. So im all ears as to why canelos going to beat him? Is it his great footwork (ive seen people move their feet in a swamp quicker) his fantastic power (couldnt stop cotto where pacquiao managed to) or his great defense (mayweather couldnt miss that big block head of his all night)?
Comment