Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Jacobs: The WBA Wants Deal, Gives Purse Bid Extension

[Nay_Sayer]

GGG is by far the bigger draw and rightly deserves 75%,

Really?

How much did Jacobs and Bumlovkin make in their last bouts? If the difference isn't a 75/25 ratio then Bumlokvin doesn't deserve 75%. Period, end of...

[BattlingNelson]

The WBA must think that progress can still be made in negotiations. Weird that they didnt reveal their ruling on the pursesplit. I guess that it means that the split of 75-25 stands.

[Fetta]

HAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA the WBA completely exposed Danny Jacobs and Al Haymon. Oops!



(ringdotcom/467473-no-purse-bid-ggg-jacobs-22nd-wba-says/)

Danny Jacobs wanted ANOTHER interim fight. It was GGG's side that as usual stood up for the fans and vehemently denied. What do you got to say now all you GGG hater idiots? What now??? You just got exposed right along with Jacobs.

Difficulty reading huh

[BattlingNelson]

Really?

How much did Jacobs and Bumlovkin make in their last bouts? If the difference isn't a 75/25 ratio then Bumlokvin doesn't deserve 75%. Period, end of...

Weird logic. Brook is a major draw in the UK. Jacobs is a major draw in ...... (Insert answer).

[Nay_Sayer]

Actually, its 150-200

According to whom exactly?

[Fetta]

Mendoza said he offered both sides an interim fight. It doesn't say Jacobs requested an interim fight. Did you read what you posted?

I caught the same thing

NSB the land of dumb people

[pacmanis1]

I've already said 67/33 would be ideal for GGG but I'd rather see him give up 7% and fight Jacobs than another Monroe or Wade. Just make the ****** fight. At the end of the day no one is paying me and I don't care what they make as long as it gets signed. Hell Jacobs could get 10 million and GGG could get 6 chickens and a trip to Disney World. I don't give a damn just make it happen.

[Nay_Sayer]

Weird logic. Brook is a major draw in the UK. Jacobs is a major draw in ...... (Insert answer).

Where exactly is Bumlovkin a major draw?

[Boxing Logic]

Mendoza said he offered both sides an interim fight. It doesn't say Jacobs requested an interim fight. Did you read what you posted?

You're so dumb lol. They offered both an interim fight. GGG's side denied it. Jacobs didn't. If Jacobs side also denied it, the article would say "both sides denied it." It's clear Jacobs wanted an interim fight, and GGG's side had to push back against the Haymon-Mendoza tagteam trying to help Jacobs duck the fight.

I caught the same thing

NSB the land of dumb people

Exactly. You. Let me ask why did GGG's side have to be so vehement in their denial if Jacobs side denied the interim fight too? If both sides denied it then it would just be a casual "nah neither of us want that. Thanks for asking." For GGG's side to have to be vehement in their denial means Jacobs side was all for it, and GGG's side had to push back strongly and say I don't care what Jacobs side wants, it's time for this fight.

Like I said, if both sides denied the offer, the article would have said both sides. It only said GGG's side denied it. I'd say do the math but maybe that's asking too much, so I did the math for you. Jacobs and GGG haters got exposed, end of story.

[Can'tHoldMeBack]

HAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA the WBA completely exposed Danny Jacobs and Al Haymon. Oops!



(ringdotcom/467473-no-purse-bid-ggg-jacobs-22nd-wba-says/)

Danny Jacobs wanted ANOTHER interim fight. It was GGG's side that as usual stood up for the fans and vehemently denied. What do you got to say now all you GGG hater idiots? What now??? You just got exposed right along with Jacobs.

I missed the part where it said jacobs asked for an interim
Fight